Just guessing, but the reported "90% accuracy" are probably related to questions that could be easily answered from an FAQ list. The rest is probably at least in part about issues where the company itself f*cked up in some way... Nothing wrong with answering from an FAQ in theory, but if all the other people get nicely worded BS answers (for which the company couldn't be held accountable), that is a nightmare from every customer's point of view.
this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
15 points (100.0% liked)
TechTakes
1989 readers
63 users here now
Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.
This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.
For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
imma gonna prompt inject me a new iPad
If a human customer service rep [added charges without telling people and lied to them], it’d just be fraud. But being able to blame the computer, that’s the use case for AI!
Potential hot take: In situations where the company attempts to diffuse responsbility, the CEO should take the blame automatically.
Yuck 🤢. I don't want this.
Much beloved US phone company Verizon
Bullshit.
It's called sarcasm.
Maybe. Or it could be corporate delusion.