this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
697 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

72319 readers
2749 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zer0bitz@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

See you guys in I2P :)

[–] MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

ha. all of my traffic is encrypted and routed through at least 3 pirate friendly countries and servers that don't keep logs. good fucking luck inspecting those packets.

[–] CallateCoyote@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago

Then pirates will just get smarter. No way for them to see who is watching all of these movies with their VPN and Debrid service.

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 60 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is how you get a new darknet.

[–] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 days ago (4 children)

In Germany and no doubt some other countries, private law firms can (on behalf of the copyright holders) request people's identity based on residential IP addresses and then send extortionist legal threats. Apparently an IP appearing on a public tracker can be enough to trigger it, without any confirmed data transfer.

VPNs are common and usually sufficient.

load more comments (4 replies)

Yep there is no way they can block I2P, they have to block all of it.

[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 154 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

If it's upheld, that's the precursor to full-blown info blackouts, just cut off internet to anyone 'accused' of wrongspeak against the powers that be, which is basically everyone.

This also sounds like SOPA reborn.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 109 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Being accused of will lose you access to basic infrastructure? Why not cut electricity too?

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 49 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Don't give them ideas. Next they'll cut the blood stream to your brain.

[–] medicsofanarchy@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Supreme Court: "One of us! One of us!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rozodru@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

give it a few months, they're working up to it.

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 61 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"the internet" is a necessity and requirement to function in society. You can't be denied access to it anymore, it would be disproportionate.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Exactly, sure disconnect customers from the Internet if they use it for entertainment... but once they use it to earn the income that pays their bills, it becomes questionable... and once it is in practice required to be a citizen, at the local, national or supra national level then it becomes a totally different question, to which the answer is basically no, you can't disconnect someone otherwise you remove their citizenship.

[–] Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pretty sure I have read somewhere that it is now also an official necessity in Germany

[–] Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 days ago

I think in Finland it is a basic utility like power and water. It is certainly priced like that.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 45 points 2 days ago

All public wifi will be disconnected pretty quickly.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Lol.

Do ISPs like making money?

Then they shouldn't disconnect users who pirate.

I get notifications from my ISP all the time. They don't do anything though because they like the money I give them.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I've been torrenting movies and software since 2000, no vpn, like I literally have torrented damn near everything I've watched for decades and have only gotten a notice once and it wasn't even me. It was from a temporary roommate who had watched a movie on a pirate streaming site.

So that tells you how good and accurate their detection techniques are.

[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Their methods are fine, they literally just pirate the stuff themselves, see which IPs connect to them, then connect those to an ISP and notify them. The main reasons you wouldn't get notices are getting lucky, not seeding much, not torrenting things that are being monitored, or having an ISP that doesn't care much.

The single notice from the streaming site makes sense, pirate streaming sites are usually honeypots or heavily monitored.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sad_detective_man@leminal.space 33 points 2 days ago

let's all fall on our sword to make sure Disney never loses a potential subscriber for Marvel Wars. Truly, we are defending the interests of the people here

[–] PanaX@lemmy.world 270 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Based on that logic, ammunition and arms manufacturers should be held liable for damages as well.

[–] compostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 161 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but that would mean that logic has any bearing on what the Supreme Court decides to do

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 50 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I hate that you're absolutely correct

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 104 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Accused???

Well alrighty then, I hereby accuse the operators of donaldjtrump.com of piracy! Anybody else notice any piratical activity? Foxnews.com seems pretty fishy.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 47 points 3 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Always make sure that QBT uses your VPN's network interface. I got some DMCA emails despite split-tunneling a VPN recently, and I realized it was bound to all interfaces by default - that's no good.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 222 points 3 days ago (22 children)

I'm not a judge, but isn't internet essentially a utility these days? Cutting someone off because of piracy seems like cutting off electricity or water because they did something illegal with it.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 140 points 3 days ago

Not even piracy. Accusations thereof.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 146 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This would be the case had net neutrality not been killed off nearly a decade ago

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 93 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure this supreme court would rule that people don't have a right to electricity, or even water. They'll probably be totally ok with people losing internet access as punishment for crossing media owners.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago (3 children)

or even water

Already did.

We never stopped the “lol treaties with Native American tribes don’t count” bullshit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] flandish@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

accused piracy, too. Not proven. Not convicted. Just “pirate go bye bye.”

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 62 points 3 days ago

Pragmatically, yes. Legally, no. Progressives have been fighting for years to get internet classified as a utility in the US, and regressives and (ironically) internet companies have been fighting against that effort at every turn in the name of profit.

And now look how well that's turned out. Gee, if only some people had warned them that deregulation was a monkey's paw...

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 76 points 3 days ago (5 children)

So if Meta is convicted of pirating books for AI training, they lose all internet connectivity? 🧐

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AGuyAcrossTheInternet@fedia.io 109 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I'm not doing piracy, I am merely training my AI!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Brotha_Jaufrey@lemmy.world 82 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This still won’t make me pay for Netflix

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] catty@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

lol, they'll have no customers! ISPs used to send 'warning' letters to customers in England but that's all.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 17 points 2 days ago

Same in the US.

I got one once from something I know for sure I didn't download. I always assumed it was a friend of mine staying with us that was torrenting "Boss's Daughter Big Booty XXX" or whatever it was, but I never really wanted to ask.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 56 points 3 days ago (18 children)

And now I'm on a VPN because if they're just gonna cut people off for accusing of piracy they're gonna have to cut off everyone with a VPN.

TBH I should have been behind a VPN before

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 84 points 3 days ago

I nominate we test with out with the Zuck and his networks.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 50 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Pirate everything, death to the capitalists.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sturlabragason@lemmy.world 70 points 3 days ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 34 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In the beginning we used to exchange cassettes. You would have a boombox with two cassettes. You would play one while you recorded on the other. Then you gave the cassette back to your friend. Next was the VCR with the big ass cassettes.

Then you would do the same with floppies, then zip disks. Then one day CD recording was a thing, then DVDs. Then thumb drives and now portable HDDs. Basically the cheapest form or recording is always the most popular way for people to share stuff.

The only ones who don't want us to share are those who want to make millions by never innovating.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 48 points 3 days ago (8 children)

The mere accusation causing someone to lose the Internet, which is vital to modern life, would be insane.

Additionally, it would do little to nothing to stop piracy.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›