this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
26 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22801 readers
3133 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer faces mounting pressure from House Democrats to resign his leadership position after supporting a Republican government funding bill that most House Democrats opposed.

Representatives Delia Ramirez, Glenn Ivey, and the liberal group Indivisible have publicly called for his resignation, with more lawmakers potentially following suit.

Critics argue Schumer betrayed House Democrats by not fighting against a bill that failed to protect agencies from DOGE cuts, while Schumer maintains avoiding a shutdown was necessary to prevent Trump from downsizing government more rapidly.

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Remember, it's not just about policy.

Schumer publicly said he would support the shutdown, the privately lead a (very) small group of congressional democrats to vote for cloture. he basically led a mutiny against against the senate democrats he purportedly leads.

How can anyone- never mind fellow senators, and representatives- trust him to follow through?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

"SENATE leader faces pressure from HOUSE Democrats" sounds great until you realize they have no means to force it to happen because they're in the other chamber of Congress.

I want to know where the fuck is the "pressure" from other Democratic Senators who could actually apply consequences!

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's still good for the House Dems to be doing this, though, calling attention to the problem so more people will call their Dem senators demanding that they take action as well.

[–] grue@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sure, it doesn't hurt, but House Democrats' focus should be on denouncing the quislings in their own chamber, since those are the ones they have the power to apply consequences to.

If that's happening, I haven't read any news about it.

Otherwise, having the Democrats criticize only across chambers while remaining silent within them starts to feel more like a tactic of avoiding accountability than one of applying it.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Only one House Dem voted yes on it (Jared Golden of Maine). So it passed 217-213 because R's have the majority and one of them defected as well. So House Dems are holding together pretty well, but as long as the R's also hold together there's nothing they can do to stop them.

Only the Senate D's could have stopped the bill, by voting against cloture (even though Dems are in the minority, cloture requires 60 votes). But not only Schumer but 9 other quislings (8 D's and 1 I) voted with the fascists. List of them here. But Schumer is Leader so if he had taken a stand against it, probably some of those other 9 would have followed his lead and it could have been stopped.

[–] cavtroop@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I want to know where the fuck is the “pressure” from other Democratic Senators who could actually apply consequences!

too busy clutching pearls and massaging their stock portfolios

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Put Bernie in charge. We need someone with a heart that beats.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I'm surprised that Sanders is older than both Trump and Biden but retains about twice as much virility as either of them and about four times as much sanity as Trump

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Not being a piece of shit tends to have a positive impact on the longevity of your brain, it seems. Yes, I'm calling Biden a piece of shit too.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Biden is like Zaphod Bebblebrox, he had his brain split into two. But the older he gets the less he can control which part is talking.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It kills me because he did have a heart issue during the 2020 campaign and it really did kill some momentum he had. But obviously it didn't last in any substantive way.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The DNC would never let him. That's the world we are in. The nominal opposition party is too concerned with fundraising and just not being the fascist party to do a damn thing.

We need a leftist tea party or a new party. Both are huge hills to climb, but I don't see the Democrats doing shit.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

DNC plan is to swoop in at election time with a batch of zionist war criminal candidates who offer to shit the bed 5% less than trump does, and see if that works.

I wish I was joking but thats literally their plan. Wait for trump to irritate us enough to accept what the donors want without any changes. They learned absolutely nothing in the past 2 decades.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

It's so damn frustrating

[–] ToadOfHypnosis@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The tea party was not an organic movement. It was vastly manufactured and funded by billionaires as a Trojan horse for their current Project 2025 agenda. Having billions funneled into your movement makes a huge difference in its success.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Money_(book)

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The Tea Party movement was well funded to distract from the real working class people’s movement the Occupy Wall Street movement

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Four times???? We're almost diving by zero here. Sanders is basically infinity times more sane.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Bernie isn't a Democrat, there's zero possibility that Senate Democrats would choose him to be their leader.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Well maybe not 0 possibility.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

However seeing as he couldn't give less of a shit what democrats want will choose to remain in office as Republicans request

[–] TemplaerDude@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

He's a loser. The Democratic party is full of losers. They lose election after election and still the same losers keep running the ship.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's worth discussing what Trump would do with a government shutdown, but Schumer seems so out of touch.

Why can't AOC's politics take hold 😞

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

because AOC's politics would mean Schumer's ~~book sales~~ bribes start falling.

[–] EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

I'd like to see him step up to a guillotine. We can't all get all the things we'd like.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Schumer was faced with a lose-lose, so he chose the losier-lose of agreeing with the Pricktator rather than the winnier-won of fighting fascism.

I think I alliterated all over myself.

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 1 points 3 weeks ago

" they were not fooled by the vote for it on cloture and vote against it on final passage."

I love how they're openly admitting this is a trick now, when so many Blue MAGA people fell all over themselves to justify it when they've done it in the past.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

If we are deporting random people for nonsense reasons, how do we add Schumer to that list? I heard him utter some antisemitic things, I swear. I felt threatened on semites behalf and laws are laws, right.

/s I'm just kidding, about "laws being laws"

[–] fritobugger2017@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Schumer is right. A shut down would have allowed trump to enact emergency powers and then there would be no further votes.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

trump is going ahead and doing whatever he wants anyway, regardless of laws or court orders, with the full support of the R party which is in the majority in both Houses anyway.

[–] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Wondering, could it be some high stakes gamble by Schumer - let the Republicans gut SS and Medicare in the hopes of picking up massive support in the midterms? If it goes wrong and there isn't a surge in support, then only 10 Dems ate exposed to voter wrath, and how many of the 10 are up for re-election soon?

[–] oyo@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

The thing is, he's playing chess while the Republicans don't give a fuck what chess is and are just flipping all the tables with games on them.

Well, that certainly would be the typical Democratic strategy: concede the game hoping that they get a good sportsmanship award.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Only 10 dems. And a population now struggling with health an retirement concerns.

[–] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Not saying I agree with the strategy, just wondering if that was his thinking.

[–] quetzaldilla@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I would say that is unlikely.

I work with a lot of really really old CPAs and lawyers, and they are just completely delusional about how hard things really are for younger generations.

"Have you tried working harder?"

"How come you haven't bought a house? We pay you [not] well!"

"My children are struggling too, I had to buy each of them their homes. Maybe ask your [destitute] parents for help?"

"Back in my day, we worked so much harder. You guys have it so easy! By the way, I cannot open this PDF and I need you to work 70hrs this week."

"There is a right way to doing things-- even if that way completely fucks you over because you have no labor protections."

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Torn on this. I see Schumer's point that shutdown could be riskier, but I also feel the Democrats need to do fucking something to resist the ruling party.

[–] tortina_original@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I must be stupid.

If Maga wanted a shutdown (because Trump could "do things"), what stops them from voting "no" themselves and getting the shutdown they so desperately want? Nothing makes sense anymore.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 3 weeks ago

Because it's win/win for them. And if they voted against the shutdown, and it happened, they can blame Democrats (they would anyway, but this would lend credence).

Either way, they continue to cripple our federal government.