atomicbocks

joined 1 month ago
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Disagree. It’s hard to watch the old one without remembering how fucking bullshit the new one is and it’s annoying to discuss the old one when it’s always going to be compared to the new one.

The remake will always taint the original.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 days ago

As confusing as it is this does still all fit into Theil’s plan to isolate the US in order to create a corpo-fascist state and bring back apartheid.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

This conversation is surreal because you don't seem to understand how disagreement works. You said the price makes sense, I am saying it doesn’t. You are free to end the discussion there if you wish but I am going to keep responding to the person who keeps acting like their opinion is fact;

Tegra GPUs are specifically cost reduced, low power versions of previous generations of GeForce GPUs. The one in the Switch 2 has been rumored to be based on the 3000 series but I have not seen any confirmation of that as yet. I feel like you are making my point for me, you keep saying that everything else costs the same so why should this one cheaper part matter… and my response is because it’s cheaper. Note the lack of PCI and Thunderbolt for instance. There is also no Windows license to worry about.

If you don't want to reply then don't but seriously it seems like you are getting upset solely because somebody has a differing opinion.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Then it seems we got off on the wrong foot when you called my disagreement meaningless.

RISC has always been fundamentally cheaper than x86 which is one reason why Nintendo has used a RISC processor in all of their handheld consoles since the original GameBoy.

Your last sentence is pretty much my point though. There is no reason for that. Look at the iPad and the Mac Mini, look at the Raspberry Pi… there is no reason for a RISC machine to cost more than an x86 machine.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Your response was to Simple’s comment about price. From my reading it seemed that you were implying that the price was right because the performance was similar. I was agreeing with Simple and disagreeing with that perceived implication based on the fact that it uses a different and historically cheaper architecture. One that would typically make a dollar per hertz comparison useless, as you seem to have pointed out. Hence my confusion.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 days ago (6 children)

there are other aspects that impact performance, so you can't make assumptions based on that

That is literally what I have been trying to say this whole time in response to you saying it looks comparable. I genuinely have no idea what you are arguing against at this point.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Huh? I’m not sure you understand what I was saying so I am just going to leave these links here:

CISC

RISC

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

I would have bet real money if you had asked me yesterday that it would have been limited to 1080p to reduce cost. I am very curious to know more about how it actually performs in each setting, how much of it is upscaling, etc. I imagine that most 4k games won’t have much in the way of better graphics than the Switch 1, the higher memory bandwidth could help with higher res textures though.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (10 children)

It’s not similar to PC hardware; It uses a Tegra processor like the Switch 1. Which means it’s more like a phone with a less than laptop grade Nvidia graphics chipset thrown in. Unlike the Steam Deck, for instance, which uses an AMD Z processor, a scaled down version of what is in the Xbox and PS5.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 18 points 4 days ago (2 children)

To further your point, this is how shit like Al Franken happens.

In general conservatives see themselves as generally good people who occasionally do bad things but it’s okay because that’s still a good person who has good intentions. Whereas in their eyes people who are in out groups are bad people who are always going to do bad things no matter what because they have bad intentions.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Where do you think AccuWeather gets their data?

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

Time is a human construct there is no “supposed”.

view more: next ›