this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
846 points (98.8% liked)

Science Memes

15781 readers
3439 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There is overwhelming evidence that this didn't happen in the Jurassic era: Stegosaurs had been extinct for tens of millions of years at that point.

The theropods ("possibly") electrocuted contemporary dinosaurs, not dinosaurs that had gone extinct 100 million years earlier.

[–] droans@midwest.social 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, but there's zero evidence the dinosaurs didn't have time machines.

[–] blx@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

There will be if they decide to invade our era tomorrow

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

You were't there man, you didn't see what I saw!

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Is there actually any biologic mechanism to generat and conduct electricity at a high enough voltage and current that it can ionize air over a distance as large as that (looks like at least 1/2m) without damaging the actual animal doing it?

Looking around, electric eels can do 860V, which is well short from the 15kV needed to gap 0.5m of air at sea level, plus that animal's skin would need to be crazy insulating for all that power to not just go down the most highly conductive way possible (all the nice conductive water all the way down to the ground contained in the animal itself) instead of having to ionize 0.5m or air.

I mean, we can always claim it was possible but lost, but then again we can also claim that for magic or animal teleportation.

Is there actually any biologic mechanism to generat and conduct electricity at a high enough voltage and current that it can ionize air over a distance as large as that (looks like at least 1/2m) without damaging the actual animal doing it?

Midichlorians. The ability to cause an extinction level event is insignificant next to the power of the Force.

[–] Tire@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s actually not ionizing the air. It’s spraying a conductive gel that the electricity rides to the prey. That’s why it’s important to hold it down to the ground to make sure it has good contact with the earth.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Uuh, nice - that sounds like it would work.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is there actually any biologic mechanism to generat and conduct electricity at a high enough voltage and current that it can ionize air over a distance as large as that (looks like at least 1/2m) without damaging the actual animal doing it?

The force dude. Its pretty obvious the t-rex is a sith lord.

[–] IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

There’s no evidence that there’s not

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Just out of pedantry: Water has terrible conductivity. Blood is less terrible though and in any case air is far worse than either, so point stands.

We can get past that particular issue if the electric dinosaur was jumping such that its victim has the shortest air gap

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pure water is a terrible conductor, but water with dissolved ions is a pretty good conductor, and that's mostly (maybe always, since things like Sodium an Potassium ions tend to be pretty important in various processes, though IANAB so maybe there are exceptions) the water inside living beings.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

More like an ok conductor, but yea that's what I meant with the blood (and whatever other ways water exists in our body). Though even pure water is more conductive than air by orders or magnitude.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Well, once you ionize it air is a great conductor ;)

[–] huf@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yes, but it's extremely complicated and bulky. first, you have to have a naked ape. then that ape has to invent science and modern technology. then it has to build an electric grid, and then eventually this becomes possible...

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, it's not actually a "biological" mechanism, though by some definitions of the word one might call it a "natural" mechanism ;)

[–] huf@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it's just a new kind of biology

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Or a new kind of Physics.

[–] callouscomic@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago

Jurassic Sith

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 77 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is why stegosaurus should have waited for backup from the council before trying to arrest T. Rex.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Why didn't the stegosaurus fire when it feared for its life??

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

It is very pleasing to know I wasn't alone in this thought.

[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Creationism be like:

Is this slop or just sloppy? What's with the little green arm behind the lightning and the weird meaty stego neck?

[–] XOXOX@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Uhh, about 83 million years separated these two species.

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

T-Rex had only 2 fingers. This shows three, so this is likely a really fat Allosaurus

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’s a lesser known relative Datassosaurus which was a thicker allosaur

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

I love learning about new dinosaurs!!

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemmy.zip 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Best comment on lemmy today.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Are you suggesting that time magic is real? The thought had crossed my mind too, but I dared not to speak of it.

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

" Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence"

But honestly, I think this is intuitive and reasonable so I accept it as factual.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That checks out.

β€œWhen you don’t have any data you have to use reason.” - Richard Feynman, some guy who watch science shows a lot

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

"Door donot" - Yoda, talking fast

Technically incorrect. There are no feathers.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago (3 children)

"There is no evidence that this didn't happen."

This line of reasoning is the same way religions "argue".

There is also no evidence that this did happen.

So I assume that it's wrong until undeniably proven otherwise by the scientific method.

[–] AHamSandwich@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I believe you have explained the joke.

Somebody find a grand jury to indict this sandwich!

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

On the one hand you are right, on the other hand, especially paleontology is basing their facts on very, very shaky evidence and a massive amount of extrapolation.

So I assume that it’s wrong until undeniably proven otherwise by the scientific method.

So you assume everything is wrong? Because in fact, that's not how the scientific method works at all.

Outside of the very few fields that are pure and untouched by reality, like e.g. maths, there are no proofs, and certainly no undeniable proofs in science. Everything is "just" a theory and is used until proven wrong or otherwise refined. Usually a theory with a decent amount of evidence, but nothing is proven beyond deniability in science. That's religion you are thinking about.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Doesn't this also result in archaeologists saying everything was for spiritual reasons or that we don't know what it was for? Like sure, I don't know exactly how it was used but I can take a pretty good guess! This isn't even limited to dildos either.

[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

One of my favorite stories about this was from an archeological investigation in housing where they found several homes where knives had been stored in the rafters of the house and all of the men in charge we debating on the religious explanations about how weapons and knives would have had to have been reveared to have been stored so high in the home. One of the female grad students walked in and looked at them all like they were idiots and said it was to keep them away from the children. There are no records of what the men had said in reaction.

[–] Ugurcan@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

Huh. I don't quite remember this Nasreddin Hoca story growing up, but I'm sure the snake says something really clever

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 5 points 2 days ago

We don’t know that they developed space travel and left Earth either.

But we aren't completely sure

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί