this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
3 points (100.0% liked)

Funny

9163 readers
1315 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 1 points 2 weeks ago

Hippos will absolutely fuck you up, though.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Fun fact, the reason some dinosaurs are depicted with lips is because the asymetrical wear on their teeth doesn't match with modern equivalent's that have exposed teeth, meaning they had "labial scale" lips.

Image owned by Mark P. Witton

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I want to take it one step further.

And no, I don't care if there's good reason to believe that Tyrannosaurs weren't fluffy like owls, I still want a decent artist's depiction of a T. rex with owl-level fluff.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Artist's depiction =|= AI slop

[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Why? They’re right. There wasn’t an artist involved in making that.

[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If you acknowledge that producing a fake image of an imagined idea is art, why is the neural net that produced this picture not an artist? What is your definition other than a thing that produces art?

How about comparing to the Campbell's soup can. Is that not art? And yet it's mass produced.

If your objection is to the quality, what specific aspect of this image vs the others in this thread, or in life, makes it low quality.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If typing a prompt into a plagiarism machine makes you an artist, why doesn’t paying a real human to make art for you also make you an artist?

If someone said they were the artist of something but it turns out they just paid someone else to do it, would you think they were a talentless jackass or an artist?

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They weren't calling themselves artists, they were saying the AI/model is the artist.

Your comparison is a strawman.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Art is made by artists, who are human, and your argument is the fallacy fallacy.

[–] OrganicMustard@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A giant murder sparrow would be horrifying as fuck, ngl.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Anyone who thinks feathered dinosaurs are somehow less terrifying need to be locked in a room with a cassowary

[–] DeltaWingDragon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

Or a secretary bird