this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
43 points (95.7% liked)

Gaming

3690 readers
111 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

Yeah, fuck buying Subnautica 2.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To give you some background, this bonus would only be gained if Unknown Worlds hit certain targets by the end of 2025. Most of it would have been paid to the three men, with 10% set aside for 40 other employees at the studio.

So the "team" would get the bonus they say? Both parties can fuck off in my opinion.

[–] kurushimi@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

The article also states that the founders had endeavored to distribute more of their share to the other employees, and this was a sticking point in Krafton’s attempt to walk back the original deal:

But the trio declined, claiming the amount was not "anything close to what they deserved, and did not allow them to share the earnout with the full team."”

Given this I don’t think we can fairly prejudge the trio — if they’d received the bonus and then reneged on their promise or made it a negligible amount then it’d be fair to judge them harshly.

[–] MrTolkinghoen@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

Frankly, the buyers truing to get them to take a smaller buyout before firing makes it clear they're doing what they can to avoid paying it. At the same time, the way the incentive was setup both parties were of course going to try to win here. No one who has 250m is going to part with it without a fight. And vice-versa.

Hindsight is 2020, but the reward structure should have never been setup based an arbitrary deadline but instead on a total level of success

[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

OMG I can't keep up! Who am I supposed to hate here!?!?

[–] scintilla@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 week ago

Just look at what krafton has done to other games and think about whether you should trust a word out of their PR team. If they have evidence I'm willing to re asses until then distrusting krafton is the safe move.