this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
4 points (52.9% liked)

Technology

73232 readers
4246 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] natecox@programming.dev 74 points 1 day ago

The title here is misleading.

Cloudflare “getting involved” would imply they decided to act of their own volition; which is not the case here.

“Cloudflare compelled to block specific piracy sites by court order” would be a more honest title.

We should at least take the time to be mad at the correct people.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

VPNs will help. The article is only talking about VPN servers based in a location with a geo ban, which, duh. But if you actually use your VPN to be in a different country and not just a different city it'll work fine.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 29 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I'd say that the title here is clickbait. The author is working awfully hard to try to frame the issue in the article in such a way that they can write that title.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The editorialized title makes it sound like they made a decision and it wasn't because of a court order.

Actual article title: "Cloudflare cracks down on UK piracy – and VPN users are getting caught in the crossfire"

Not much better, but it is better than the OP's title.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Usually Cloudflare fights (successfully) against the orders, laying the responsibility with ISPs. This marks a change in corporate policy.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

they don't just whimsically decide on a daily basis whether or not to comply with court orders. something changed legally that caused them to take action.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

That assumes they didn't fight and lose this time.