this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
78 points (98.8% liked)

UK Politics

4106 readers
201 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Of course he is, the left don't like Starmer because he's a wolf and the right don't like him because he's wearing sheep's clothing.

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 days ago

Calling Starmer a wolf does him too much credit. At best, he's a caterpillar being piloted by the cordyceps that is Morgan McSweeney.

[–] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

And let's not forget, he's just so dull, uninspired and uninspiring.

to be fair everything is more popular than starmer

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 16 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Well he lost two elections with more voter then Keith won one.

But he seems unable to accept he only won. Because more people opposed hi opponents then him. Trying gain from those voters rather then the ones refusing to vote for him. Is just lazy.

Not to mention a desperate attempt to ignore democracy. And much of his own party. His current anti migraint negativity. And disability discrimination. Dose not have a strong following in his party members.

[–] LuckingFurker@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Corbyn was also trying to navigate Brexit for those two elections and anything less than a full-throated insistence on parroting "Brexit means Brexit" turned the pro-Brexit crowd away, while the anti-Brexit crowd turned away in advance because he was in favour of it. He bottled it before that second election he lost and tried to get the anti-Brexit crowd back on board and just alienated the pro-Brexit crowd

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 8 points 6 days ago

Yes and know. I remember many rejecting Corbyn for not ignoring Brexit. The party members were very split over the subject.

[–] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't think there was a way to win it. The remainers knew it was electoral suicide to ignore Brexit, but would attack him until he moved to that position.

I agree, there probably wasn't really a winning move for him, but he still panicked after the European elections that year and decided to push the idea of a second referendum more and that definitely killed whatever chance he had in that last election

[–] deadcatbounce@reddthat.com 10 points 5 days ago

Herpes also more popular than Starmer.

[–] Novamdomum@fedia.io 1 points 4 days ago

This is where Corbyn always gets it wrong. Flash in the pan popularity doesn't translate into votes. He's going to get all excited again and then loose... again. Not saying the sun shines out of any particular orifice of Starmers, but you've got to have an actual plan that makes sense to get into power. Right now it's all soundbites and potshots. What are you ACTUALLY going to do Jeremy? This country needs help, not more words.