this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
236 points (99.6% liked)

politics

23191 readers
2811 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary:


The wife of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador by the Trump administration, was forced to move to a safe house with her children, after the government posted their home address to social media.

White House officials have spent weeks trying to justify their deportation of Abrego Garcia, even after admitting in court that sending him to El Salvador was an “administrative error,” claiming with no evidence that he is a violent criminal and gang member.

At one point, the Department of Homeland Security posted online an order of protection that Jennifer Vasquez Sura had sought, but later abandoned, against her husband. That order contained Vasquez Sura’s home address, unredacted.

“I don’t feel safe when the government posts my address, the house where my family lives, for everyone to see, especially when this case has gone viral and people have all sorts of opinions,” Vasquez Sura told The Washington Post. “So, this is definitely a bit terrifying. I’m scared for my kids.”

Vasquez Sura, a U.S. citizen, is now staying in an undisclosed location with her three children while Abrego Garcia remains thousands of miles away, despite a Supreme Court order requiring the U.S. government to facilitate his return. Both the Trump administration and Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele say that Abrego Garcia will not be coming back to the U.S., and Vasquez Sura has received hateful comments and taunts on social media.


top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 59 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The United States government is a rogue terrorists organization

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 50 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I mean, they did tell us ahead of time....

We are all Domestic Terrorists

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 18 points 4 days ago

So those are the "homegrowns" the orange one was talking about, right?

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 3 points 4 days ago

Always has been

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 57 points 4 days ago (3 children)

The wife of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador by the Trump administration, was forced to move to a safe house with her children, after the government posted their home address to social media.

I really wish the media would stop lying for the Trump administration. It wasn't a mistake, they deported him intentionally.

[–] xtr0n@sh.itjust.works 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

And it isn’t deportation. Deportation is sending someone to another country, generally the one they originally came from and where they hopefully have citizenship. This is paying some completely unrelated country to imprison someone with no legal avenue for due process or release. The best description I can come up with is kidnapping and imprisonment abroad.

ETA: it’s been pointed out that Mr Garcia is originally from El Salvador so this isn’t one of the cases where we’re sending Venezuelans to an unrelated country. It’s still super fucked up since the dude had legal status and no criminal record and no due process. Is El Salvador just a lawless dictatorship? The CIA just completely fucked up Latin America for generations :(

[–] NJSpradlin@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

In this case I thought he was actually from there. The issue was that he had legal status and he hasn’t been found guilty of a crime related to affiliation to MS13.

[–] xtr0n@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago

Oh, you’re right. He is originally from El Salvador. I think I may be confusing him with someone else, I thought they sent some Venezuelans to El Salvador.

[–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 4 days ago

Even though in this case it is deportation, the word you were looking for is rendition.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 3 points 4 days ago

Garcia is from El Salvador, though. Doesn't excuse what was done to him, though, since he was given withholding of removal status in 2019 due to the danger he faced if he returned there.

The Venezuelans that were deported to El Salvador fit your description, though.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 4 days ago

The best description I can come up with is kidnapping and ~~imprisonment~~ concentration camp abroad.

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yup. He was getting deported. Republicans say they just sent him to the wrong country because they are stupid. So that means no Republican can get in trouble. Because "I'm too stupid to get in trouble" is still a god damn thing.

[–] NJSpradlin@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

How does it go..? ‘Qualified immunity’ for elected officials?

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Credible outlets can (and should) only report what is verifiable. They can't (and shouldn't) speculate or say things they can't back up / prove. This includes motives.

People really need to learn how journalism works and stop bemoaning that every headline everywhere isn't filled to the brim with speculative rhetoric.

"Mainstream media is complicit because they don't use the charged rhetoric I demand" is a purity test attitude I've grown quite sick of around here.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Then it seems that they should have left out "mistakenly" if they only report verifiable things that they can prove, including motives.

The media needs to not treat this as normal or blundering. MAGA know what they are doing: making this country intolerable to immigrants.

This isn't a purity test, it's criticism. That's a perfectly fine thing to do.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's not "the media"s job to tell anyone how to feel about anything. It's not the media's job to say "this is good" or "this is bad". It IS their job to report the facts, paint the picture as accurately as they can with those facts, and leave it up to the reader/viewer to make up their own minds.

Putting things into context is one thing, but treating any situation as inherently good, evil, desired, undesired, etc is not their job; they're just there to report what's happening. Goddamn I hate what cable news has done to journalism.

it seems that they should have left out "mistakenly"

The administration has admitted to an "administrative error" which makes "mistakenly" an accurate description.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Which is why I said the media is lying for the Trump administration: this is the lie that the administration told, and the media repeats it for them.

The fact is that they didn't give a fuck if they could deport him or not.

Saying he was "mistakenly deported" makes it sound like they cared one bit. There was no error; the judge issued an order asking for any evidence of that, and he got crickets back.

That “journalism works” is a bold statement while Jeff Bezos is dismantling the Washington Post and the New York Times has become a word game and recipe site that does reporting on the side.

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 32 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Whoaaa what the fuck? A department of the US government publicly doxxed this lady??

[–] breezeblock@lemm.ee 21 points 4 days ago

Cruelty is the point

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago

Normally I'd go, whoa, someone really fucked up but with this group of assholes we know our was intentional to get her killed by their cultist.

[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 days ago

Why are we not seeing criminal contempt charges?

[–] letsgo2themall@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

it's ok. it was just an "administrative error".

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

It wasn’t an accident. Posting any document probably was checked to make sure it didn’t contain any names of police. They most certainly had someone see the address and make a decision to release it or not.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

They are not even trying to hide the stochastic terrorism.