this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
41 points (78.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

40367 readers
1426 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They look so damn similar, from the style and color of their armor down to their behavioral traits. Seems like Bungie simply saw the success that Doom had over their Marathon series and thought to themselves "you know what our next game needs? A massively overpowered super soldier in green high tech armor who spouts sarcastic one liners in the face of an overwhelming alien invasion" and went to town with that concept. And it worked like a charm, they cranked out six massively successful games before id/Bethesda decided it was time to reboot the Doom franchise 2016.

Perhaps it was payback for them to give Doomguy the Crucible in the reboot games (which looks a lot like the energy sword from Halo), but I can't help but think these two are essentially the same character.

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 hours ago

For the same reason that two boring white dudes can star in two different movies in the same year about the White House being taken over by terrorists

Because similar isn't the same. As long as they can argue that specifics are different enough, that's all that matters.

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago

Doom guy (from Doom 1 and 2) is derivative of Ash from Army of Darkness, down to the facial expressions, the chainsaw, and the shotgun.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Early video game copyright history was also a lot more loosy goosie. Bethesda cut its teeth on Terminator licensed games, because no one really cared about video games and corporations would give away licensing rights for a song.

If you look at early gaming history, there’s a lot of stuff that wouldn’t fly today copyright wise. (Iirc Nethack has enemies from Tron, folks very happily made and distributed Star Trek fan games - heck, in the early 00’s you could buy unofficial mod packs for video games in stores.)

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

LOAD "TREK64",8

RUN

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Fascinating. Thanks for the link.

The first dude seems like a blatant copy of Guile to me, so I had to look up what the court thought:

In spite of the intentional similarities between the two games, the court concluded that Data East did not infringe upon Capcom's copyright, as most of these similarities were not protected under copyright.

Capcom vs Data East

So 100% guilty of being a blatant copy, but not illegal.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

This is not Guile... Cut to throwing sonic boom

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 day ago

Why would they? Getting inspiration or doing something similar to something that already exist is not illegal. And it shouldn't be. All art is derivative, and that's ok.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 94 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)
  1. They're both "generic future soldier guy."

  2. They're still distinct enough that no one would confuse them.

  3. The current version of the Doomslayer came after Halo and does more ripping off Halo than Halo ever ripped of Doom.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They’re still distinct enough that no one would confuse them.

I've only played the original doom, from the early 90s. In that gsme your only view of your character is a little head in the hud. This head does not have armor on. You only see a human face. The promo/box shows the armor, so I'm not saying he isn't wearing it. I'm just saying you don't see yourself in game wearing it.

I've never played halo.

All that being said, the photo in this post shows both master chief and doom guy. I have no idea which is which. 50/50 chance I get it right.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've only played the original doom, from the early 90s. In that gsme your only view of your character is a little head in the hud

You never played multiplayer? You never saw the dead Marines in the first level? You didn't see the box art for the game and the intro menu?

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Never played multiplayer. I don't remember any dead marines in the first level, but it HAS been 30+ years. So, maybe my memory is lacking.

And I SAID that he's wearing armor on the promo/box art. I already.

The menu I remember was seeing first person perspective running through a level, while a bunch of menu choices fell from the top of the screen until you chose one.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

The menu I remember was seeing first person perspective running through a level, while a bunch of menu choices fell from the top of the screen until you chose one.

Idk what game that was but it wasn't doom. Doom had a pretty straightforward menu for the time.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

About point 2: I would argue that you could convince any judge that these characters are sufficiently distinct in the legal sense. IRL, people might still confuse them, but that’s not the point here. Just look at some of the competing car designs to get a feel for what is legally distinct enough these days. You can come up with a cartoon character, car or a sci-fi warrior that copies over 90% from something else, and you can still get away with it.

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Yeah I was going to point out #3.

I bet that halo took the original space marine doomguy armor and modernized it, then doom later realized but didn't have a way out since halo had become so successful.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today -2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

It wasn't necessary for both to be green. Master Chief could've had a blue (or a red, or black, or silver) armor and he'd still be the same.

[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

John Halo and the Marines are Marines and not Soldiers. Though, I'm not certain Halo ever shows a non-Navy Servicemember in 1-4.

[–] LunarLoony@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

For what it's worth, the Army briefly shows up in Reach.

[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I think the only thing I remember about Reach is the last mission anyway but thanks for the heads up.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Green is the universal color of soldiers. The regular soldiers in Halo were wearing green. Master Chief's armor was green because he was a soldier. It made perfect sense to me.

If I remember the Halo books correctly (it’s been a while) the Spartan armor started out a golden color but dulled to green hue due to hits from Covenant energy weapons over time. Not particularly relevant to this discussion but I thought it was an interesting bit of lore.

I need to go back and reread them. Great series and well written for the most part.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

The protagonist in Halo: Reach wears gray armor with blue accents and he looks just as badass as Master Chief, if not moreso.

[–] LunarLoony@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 16 hours ago

Just want to add that, yes, Noble Six's default armour is very cool; but you can also have them wear whatever armour and colours you like. (Including making them look basically like the Chief)

Sure, but they had to start somewhere. Reach is the 6th Halo game.

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Halo reach came out way later, and doesn’t look half as good as master chief but that’s not due to the coloring and instead the worse looking armour

[–] Smoolak@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

One argument that hasn't been discussed here is the fact that Bethesda has been owned by Microsoft since 2021. It's likely that Microsoft had been planning to acquire the company for several years prior to the official purchase too.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 0 points 1 day ago

Possible, but in that case it might have actually helped them to first tie them up in a difficult and potentially expensive lawsuit in order to lower the purchase price. Sounds like something Microsoft would do...

[–] AlexisBlackbird@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago

I reckon it's way too generic to sue over

[–] StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Originally doom guy was just a face at the bottom of the HUD that grunted and got bloody as you took hits. The only images of him I remember was just a marine in green combat armor, not too dissimilar to modern real world combat armor, standing on a pile of dead demons and zombies(1993) and the 3rd person cinematics from Doom 3 (early 2000s ish?) where again he looked just like a normal human marine.

Halo come around in the mid 2000’s and Master Chief was never shown outside his armor or with his helmet off. Outside the TV show I’m not sure if that is still the case.

Not sure when the modern images of doom guy came about but I think it was around 2015. Probably not earlier.

[–] fartsparkles@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

For those of us who played Doom multiplayer over a network back in the 90s (the OG “Deathmatch”), you were very familiar with Doomguy(s): Image

Not to mention the iconic box art: Image

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Halo 1 was released in 2001, doom 3 was 2004 current doom was 2015.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

That's a good point. I mean Doomguy WAS very clearly visible on the box art wearing a green outfit and a gray helmet, but the outfit appears to be made of cloth rather than steel, and he looks more like a football player than anything.

His modern appearance in full power armor was indeed only introduced with the 2016 reboot.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Marathon's Security Officer already had the green armor and shiny mask.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Games workshop would then have to use both of them. Space marines pre-date both of them.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

I mean, can you really put a patent on the idea of an astronaut suit for space soldiers? That seems way too generic.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But they generally have blue and gold armor, no?

[–] Kirca@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The "poster boys" are the Ultramarines, who rock the blue and gold, but there are a tonne of different chapters with individual colour schemes.

In saying that I don't there are really any super popular ones rocking green at the time (probably were, but I don't recall any)