this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

68526 readers
3287 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheViper123@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

“Third party ink” existing as a phrase is the problem.

[–] ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Brother was the last decent printer company, wasn't it?

[–] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Maybe Lexmark? OKI? I vaguely recall there was 1 other not-evil printer company.left.

Otherwise, I've heard good things about clay tablets.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This sounds accurate based on the user reports. They're not bricking anything, they just make you do manual registration if you use third party toner.

[–] LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

I have a black and white brother laser printer that had 3rd party toner that worked fine for years, it was even a two pack of toner. Then I installed a firmware update and immediately it threw an error stating trouble with the toner and refused to print. Tried the unopened 2nd toner, same error. Looked and searched all over online and could not find the previous firmware to try a roll back.

I then purchased a new two pack of 3rd party toner from a different brand and it worked just fine. My guess is with each new firmware they also have a set of chips to block (each toner has a chip on it) that they bundle into to update.

I'll never install another firmware update for that printer now.

I would consider what they did as bricking my toner.

[–] suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

....they just make you do manual registration if you use third party toner

Man, if only we had a word for disabling critical features in this way.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If there is one, it's not "bricking", because it still functions as a printer.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Upvoted for understanding the concept of words having already established definitions

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's a very mutable word due to it's metaphorical nature. It's certainly not set in stone.