this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
299 points (99.0% liked)

politics

23207 readers
3509 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 14 hours ago

That silly goose.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 79 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Why don't we start piss testing all of our elected officials like a dozen times a month?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

That's only for the poor and the working class.

[–] Jackcooper@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I truly think the amount of people willing to do the awful shit for trump is finite. That's why no one's getting fired and why doge even hired back a dude who was pretty blatantly racist.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 26 points 1 day ago

If we can’t hold them up to treason charges, what makes you think a drug charge would matter?

Because we're taking the piss enough as is

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

One wonders if the same people who want people on welfare to be drug tested would be able to piss clean themselves…

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Put 'em in a pool, we'll fill it with piss and see how it goes from there. That kind of test?

[–] YesButActuallyMaybe@lemmy.ca 2 points 21 hours ago

Yes, if they float they are obviously a witch

[–] badbrainstorm@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They be loading those deportation planes up with coke coming back from El Salvador to celebrate another successful round of human rights violations

[–] Bieren@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

This actually makes a lot of sense.

[–] Vinny_93@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Really? This quintessential 80s businessman type used cocaine? I'm shocked.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 3 points 1 day ago

Well I think 80's business types would

  1. Have more respect for the Institute that is the Pentagon.

  2. Be more professional than this dweeb.

Not by much but they would have some moral standards concerning their appearance in media.

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago

I would honestly be shocked if Pete wasn't on coke. Genuinely would be surprised

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 8 points 1 day ago

Can't wait until he gets boneitis.

[–] letraset@feddit.dk 9 points 1 day ago

It's hard to believe isn't it? Must just be the work of some mudslinging disgruntled former employees.

[–] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Hopefully, he is so busy being the quintessential '80s guy he forgets to cure his Boneitis

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And? I wouldn't be surprised if they were cooking meth in the oval. This admin would've been impeached and jailed in any other timeline what the fuck is nose candy going to change here?

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Nah they have pure coke, meth is for poor people.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Pure coke, or Adderall. Ketemine seems to also be popular with this administration.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Their dealers know how stupid they are, so that cola has been stepped on like mad.

[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

[Joe Kasper, Hegseth's soon-to-former chief of staff] reportedly derailed a meeting with a veterans’ group by telling a story about a night out at a Washington, D.C. strip club. He was also said to have begun a meeting by saying, “Can I just tell everyone around this table that I just took an enormous s--t right before coming in here?”

Kasper was a Trump nominee. Only the best people.

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Kasper will remain an adviser at the Pentagon in a special government employee role, limited to working no more than 130 days a year.

And also consequences are for show, he's not really fired.

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

You love to hear it