this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
738 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

16497 readers
1745 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Skua@kbin.earth 47 points 1 day ago (4 children)

There's an old stately home near me (in the UK) where a few redwoods were planted some time around 1900. The scale of those things is genuinely bewildering. They're so much bigger than every other tree that it messes with your sense of perspective a little

It's also weird how squishy the bark is. It's like a giant funfair plushie tree

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They grow really well in the UK climate.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-68518623

Better than in California, it turns out.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 4 points 1 day ago

Oh holy shit, we have half a million of them‽ I was under the impression it was just a few scattered around the place

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I really hope that you never get a proper storm. Someone tried to grow redwoods in KY. He was trying to have a way to legally harvest the wood. Grew the couple acres of redwood trees to over 80 feet in height by year 20. Then a thunderstorm came through, and knocked all the trees down. The root systems don't have a massive taproot, and spread horizontally.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

We don't really get that in the UK. If they survived the "hurricane" of 1987, chances are they're still there.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How do they fair in their native western US?

[–] porksnort@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 day ago

They really do better in groves with lots of root systems entangled, providing each other mutual support. Quick-growing them plantation style reveals the weakness of the root systems.

Similarly, when the naturally grown redwoods were logged in the us west, the ones that were intentionally left to serve as seed stock for reforestation often fell down without their tree-bros.

Modern practices dictate leaving small groves intact rather than isolated individual trees.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what qualifies as a "proper" storm for you - the UK never gets anything like the cyclones in India or the Caribbean - but we did have one of our worst on record at the start of this year. I actually haven't been along to the place since then. If I get a chance this weekend I'll go have a look, see if I can get some photos for shalafi elsewhere in this thread too

I'm talking about the high wind thunderstorms that frequent the US. Not as big as a cyclone or hurricane, but just as destructive.

[–] CH3DD4R_G0BL1N@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The other cool thing about that squishy bark is that it’s flame retardant.

I finally went to go see the California redwoods as a bucket list before they burned down and learned they don’t tend to.

There were almost as many lightning struck redwoods around, still alive and kicking not giving a fuck, as there were undamaged.

Very cool opportunities to stand inside shed sized hallowed out areas and admire.

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Growing up in California (especially Southern) you learn about "Fire Ecology" and how wildfires are a normal and natural part of the ecosystem and that many California-native flora are dependent on semi-regular burns. The problem with the fires lately isnt that they're happening, it's that they're happening too frequently.

Basically, don't worry, those sequoias will outlive us all

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I get all choked up seeing them a year or so after a fire, the limbs burn off and they start sending thousands of new little baby limbs out, most will die back and the ones in the best positions will grow. The the whole upper part of the tree is green with new life and I’m just so proud of them.

We’ve had some pretty devastating fires here, so the emotions are high.

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 4 points 1 day ago

Nature is amazing, thanks for the photo

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The problem with the fires lately isnt that they're happening, it's that they're happening too frequently.

I thought the problem was that they weren't happening frequently enough, allowing too much undergrowth to build up and make them worse than they're supposed to be?

(But I'm not from California, so you probably know better.)

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

Depends on where it's located.

In some areas with very active fire suppression, they allowed massive buildup of material to burn. This is what happened to Yellowstone and a bunch of national forest around the west and into Canada.

In other areas drought is causing more frequent and hotter burns. This is what is is happening in the Southwest now with the mega-drought.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There are redwoods in the UK?! I'd love a pic, how fascinating.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

Loads of them, apparently.

https://www.redwoodworld.co.uk/locations.htm

Most of the ones on this site have pictures. Been to several of these places myself. Most of the trees are fairly young still, so not at the "towering over everything for miles" level.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 18 points 1 day ago

Not naturally, but a fair few of our landed gentry got really into trees while we were doing the whole empire thing and brought all sorts of them to their grounds. Since we have a wet temperate climate here the trees seem to like it

I'm afraid I have no pics of these specific ones. I genuinely couldn't get a good line of sight with my little phone camera

[–] Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

Funny how I was able to get the pun even though I was not familiar with "je ne sais quoi"

[–] thejoker954@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I really hope I get the chance to see them in person before I die.

[–] Drewmeister@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Having done Redwoods national park and Sequoia national park within a few days of each other early this summer, here's my advice:

Redwoods contain a lot of California Redwoods (Sequoia sempervirens), and they are super impressive. But Sequoia contains a lot of Giant Sequoias (Sequoiadendron giganteum), and those just boggle the mind. It's like being on another planet. I very highly recommend The Congress Trail, which starts at the largest tree in the world (by volume) and continues through multiple groves.

So do Sequoia second, or just Sequoia if you have to choose.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Yeah California redwoods are kind of all over Northern California, they’re commonish in backyards. Giant Sequoias on the other hand you’ll basically only see in a park.

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago

I'll for the both of us then.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I have this strange suspicion that this will not be the last time I am told this joke.

[–] TurkeyDurkey@piefed.world 6 points 1 day ago
[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

/c/dadjokes