this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
66 points (98.5% liked)

World News

2594 readers
161 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 3 points 15 hours ago

Pharaoh Trump losing his chariots to the sea. History rhymes

[–] CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 2 days ago (4 children)

We all agree they're getting shot down right?

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No they're not getting shot down directly, because Ansarallah/the Houthis have never claimed a shoot down during their public statements (while they are very quick to claim the shootdown of MQ-9 Reaper drones for instance), Yemen don't have the systems to shoot down aircraft hundreds of kilometres out at sea where the losses take place, and there's been no evidence presented of manned US aircraft going down over Yemeni soil, no wreckage, no ejections over Yemen, no search and rescue missions for the pilots, no pilots captured by the Yemeni Armed Forces.

However, the F-18 losses are still a result of Ansarallah/Houthi attacks on the aircraft carrier. So still as a result of Ansarallah/Houthi attacks, even though they're not being shot down directly. As for the three F-18s lost by the USS Harry Truman aircraft carrier during it's 7½ month deployment, here's a breakdown:

  • First during a friendly fire incident: F-18 in mid air refueling configuration (F-18s can refuel other F-18s) went out to hunt a drone, upon returning to its regular flight path, an air defence operator on the USS Gettysburg lit it up with an SM-2 thinking it was the drone.

  • Second fell out of the hangar bay with tow truck attached during evasive maneuvers, during an Anti Ship Ballistic Missile (ASBM) attack.

  • Third had an arrestor hook malfunction, while trying to land during an ASBM attack.

[–] stink@lemmygrad.ml 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Considering the military generally recruits people who have nothing else going for them, I can imagine they just keep forgetting to put the planes in park

[–] Gucci_Minh@hexbear.net 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not far from the truth, long deployments and exhaustion will lead to negligence. The previous one was due to an arrestment failure, so the plane couldn't hook on and overshot the deck, but I would not be surprised if someone forgot to secure some chains and a plane rolled off for the one before that.

[–] Commiejones@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 day ago

They aren't taking them out of the sky. Let's just say Ansarallah are directly responsible for their destruction.

[–] chesmotorcycle@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 day ago

Yeah, it's one thing to lose a single plane to an accident. But 3? No way.

[–] engelsaxons@hexbear.net 17 points 2 days ago
[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

These planes and pilots are well prepared for arrestment failures. genuinely surprised that was what caused this most recent crash

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago

they were under ASBM attack at the time, causing things to get hectic and the carrier to be doing evasive maneuvers

[–] fox@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a long deployment and much more active than they usually are. They're likely getting fatigued and overlooking things.

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago

they also were under missile attack during the last 2 losses, and drone attack during the 1st. Ansarallah has directly caused these losses, it's not just American failure it's the effective actions of the world's bravest troops