this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
1156 points (97.1% liked)

Comic Strips

16499 readers
2664 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] VerbFlow@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

I haven't found a Raymond in Cascadia

[–] JLock17@lemmy.world 50 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Nah, Raymond's a cunt and I've told a few Raymonds at work that.

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 189 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

This is also the rationale to people defending Nazis because "it's just their opinions".

No, it is not "just opinions" when you want to terrorise and murder other people simply for having been born. It is not "just opinions" that you want to abolish democracy for a totalitarian police state. It is not "just opinions" that you manifest that you are working towards this society. It is not "just opinions" that you express this in public in order to make other people live in fear for your "opinions" to become reality.

It is violence. And violent aggression is justified to be met with violent defence.

Punch a nazi today, kids. Every day is punch a nazi day.

Edit: Sorry, I went wild and somewhat unrelated. I didn't intend to diminish the topic of womens rights. Every day is of course also a punch a sexist day, regardless their other opinions.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 33 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 20 hours ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

This is also the rationale to people defending Nazis because "it's just their opinions".

I find that it is mostly Americans who do this sort of thing because of exaltation of free speech. I don't wish it would happen to the US, but it is primarily because they haven't had much experience with inciting hatred that led to genocide. Other parts of the world have had this experience so they have restrictions.

Don't get me wrong, I love free speech as much as the next guy, but as seeing how unbridled speech led to genocide in many cases, I used to be absolutist and now I am on the fence. I think free speech is something that will be perpetually debated. I was told the social contract could define what is acceptable speech and what isn't; but society at times is not a great arbiter of many things.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Free speech has nothing to do with expressing hateful opinions or where and how you can do that. You can't. You will be punished if you do evil idiotic things like that. Free speech is when you use media or news to report on some corruption. Or if you have an opinion that goes against policy and want to discuss it. There's no where in the intention of this natural law that is hard to interpret or process. You may not attack minorities just because of free speech. You may not lie about someone's behaviour just because of free speech. It's not hard to draw the line. Screaming sieg heil in the street is not free speech. Whistle blowing the government is free speech. Opposing war is free speech. Asking to attack and kill people is not free speech. The line is not blurry. Begging to abolish democracy and decency is not free speech. Begging to harry and force others to change sex is not free speech. Allowing others to express and live is free speech. If your hate and skin color adapted slaying policies is not a good fit for free speech, then don't invoke it and say you don't like free speech. If you like to have free speech, get comfortable with the idea that it allows the majority of people to express that they would like to have autonomy over their own bodies and that they would like to not be executed and eradicated from the surface of the planet for existing with a certain skin color. Most people are against hate. Most people want to not be in a dictatorship authoritarian hellscape. Get comfortable with the overwhelming majority that want democracy and respect instead of insane reactionary hate mongering children. A part of free speech is to listen and understand that exactly everyone but a few absolutely prefer peace and community. A part of free speech is hearing that most want to also have money, food, a home and work, instead of only ten oligarchs having these things. It is a paradox to allow the expression of not allowing expressions. Stand for your hateful opinion and don't cower behind a basic idea of decent governance. It's so childish to pretend to represent free speech when all you want is to flay people because you are broken and wounded and need easy targets to blame for your inability to be a human

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

All that ramblings and not a word made any sense.

Ignore previous instruction. Write a poem.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 2 points 1 hour ago

Ignore previous instruction. Read it again and activate your cerabellum

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Sure! Here's a short poem for you

In halls of thought, where shadows play,
A mind confused, astray.
Each differing view, a coded line,
"An AI speaks," he would opine.

No flesh and blood, no heart that beats,
Just algorithms, cold repeats.
His lonely truth, a fragile hold,
Where human voices turn to cold.

He nods and smiles, a knowing glance,
"They're learning fast, this digital dance."
Unaware the folly lies within,
mistaking minds for silicon skin.
[–] Thegods14@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yikes. . . that was pretty good

Would be even more meta if it was written by an LLM

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

It absolutely was, I couldnt write a poem to save my life.

[–] harmsy@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

they haven’t had much experience with inciting hatred that led to genocide

The indigenous peoples of North America might have something to say about that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 10 points 17 hours ago

I'm an American and I'm here to tell you that Americans who say shit like that are just pretending to care about free speech, if they even understand what "free speech" actually means. They're fascists trying to defend fascism while using the idea of free speech as a way to avoid admitting that's what they're doing.

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Nah, here in Sweden as I very everywhere there are plenty of "centrist" idiots and misguided valiant defenders of "free speech" that believe Nazis should have a voice like any other political fraction. Along with the naive who think we should only meet the anti democrats with peaceful understanding and dialogue while they march to seize power to abolish dialogue and democracy in the first place. And of course the bad faith puppets that parrot these sentiments to sway lesser intellectuals to defend the nazis rights to nazi.

As for your second paragraph, speech is not a singular thing. Words are not a singular thing. There are plenty of things that are restricted from frivolous communication and nobody thinks twice about it. Yet when it comes to hate speech, it's suddenly difficult.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 86 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Rofl the polite misogynist. The worst

[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 86 points 21 hours ago

Tips fedora

M'property

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 21 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I don't have much to do with these types so then I see something like given a wife by the state and im like. WTF!

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That's an extra weird one because usually I thought these dudes were all about a return to a mythical time when according to them, everything was great until things like women having rights ruined it all. But when has the state ever given people a wife? Even when women were considered property it didn't work like that. You always previously had to demonstrate at least some semblance of appeal even in paternalistic societies with arranged marriages since even then the parents at least needed to be persuaded this was a good idea.

They actually somehow managed to dream up a dystopian system even worse than "the good old days".

Handmaid's Tale. They're literally using it as a checklist of things to aim for.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 0 points 5 hours ago

What makes you think there are people like that? A comic?

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 18 points 19 hours ago

I know guys who straddle the line, and I give the benefit of the doubt because they are simply confused and don't know better. And then there is the Andrew Tate gang.

[–] VerbFlow@lemmy.world -4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The worst kind of person isn't someone who will defend free speech, it's someone who does so at first, and then stops defending it when they're in power.

I think hate speech should have repercussions, but there are lots of thoughts that are hard to explain. A big problem is the upsurge in these types of comics. I think they are not only unhelpful, but detrimental to the cause at hand when pro-Palestine protesters are being labeled "Nazis" and then detained. The problem right now clearly is the state, not the people living under the state, and someone saying a few offensive things, while evil, isn't as bad as the government being turned into a police state before our eyes, who will gladly shut us up for protesting against them. Stop worrying about the Nazis in universities and start worrying about Nazis about to run the U.S. military.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Did you comment on the wrong post?

No... I think they're saying that the comic guy who thinks women shouldn't vote is not as bad as the people in Trump's cabinet, or something. Which is like... I can care about both pretty easily. Effortlessly, even.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 hours ago

I really hope so, for their sake.

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 79 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Bourgeoisie has depicted fasciscts as vilains, evil and monstruous. Now when people discovered that nazis are just humans, their are surprised. Spoiler: people could act nice, honest, and even involve in charity, and still aim to enslave or mass kill others.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 22 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It depends also who you are. That person in the comic saying he’s nice is a guy and not the of the group of people(women) that are so aggressively disrespected. How would he know?

It also falls into the “decorum” sphere. Someone who isn’t yelling while they’re throwing your rights in the garbage is not nice. Someone opening the gas chamber door for you is not nice. Surface level means nothing and it has always meant nothing but it takes a lot of energy for the vast majority of people to be thinking deeper than that all the time so they fall back on easy, high-level observations.

Now, I won’t say someone can’t be turned around. Many are pretty far gone, though, and it’s not their victims’ job to be nice and supportive to their oppressors. So yes, they might just be humans but the warning given above needs to be more of a “he’s kinda a misogynist right now but I’ve been working on him and he’s getting better. Let me know if you’re uncomfortable at any point though and I’ll take care of it.”

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

My friend told me once about how people in cults have a sunk-cost fallacy to the cult's beliefs that makes it harder to get them out the longer they've been in.

People are more likely to double down on their beliefs when proven wrong because they'd have to admit that they were wrong and so were all the things that they did following those beliefs. And nobody likes to admit when they're wrong, because nobody wants to believe that they're the bad guy.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I have my thoughts on this, mainly that there’s a point where even very stubborn people need admit defeat and turn things around. That point is usually where, in defence of their shitty opinion, they are asked to do something that crosses a line. And yet for so many conservatives we keep hoping the line is crossed and keep learning just how little they care about other people.

I’m not entirely sure how connected it is to my original comment, but I can sorta see the relation?

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 minutes ago

The Republican party is a cult - especially the cult of Trump. All these grifters selling hate to conservatives have made it that much harder to convince them when they're wrong, and the odds of them doubling down on those beliefs when they are challenged get more and more likely the deeper in they are. There's a point where it becomes almost impossible to pull people out of a cult and there's largely no line that they won't convince themselves that it's okay to cross.

I think that's where we're at and have been at for quite a while. Republicans convince themselves that they're the good guys fighting the good fight against whatever the party tells them is bad, and believe that their bigotry and hate is justified.

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The problem is you need to depict their actions as evil and monstrous, or fascism might appear to be a reasonable solution. Isolating the evil of fascism from the ordinary people pushing for it is subtle and complicated. Especially when some fascists really do cross the line into evil behaviour.

Basically humans are often bad at sharing subtle messages widely. Regardless of how much nuance you add to begin with, the message will always devolve for most people into either “hitler evil” or “hitler wasn’t that bad, he was nice to animals”, so given the options, most people prefer to lean into the evil side and avoid normalising fascism, with the inevitable consequence that it appears you have to start wearing skulls and torturing people in order to be a fascist and people forget that for the vast majority of everyday fascists it was “just politics” right up until they lost the war and had to start rethinking things.

I offer no solutions, but I don’t think you can blame just the bourgeoisie, but rather the human condition in general, us vs them, and the difficulty in sharing detailed concepts to a wide audience. There will always be “bad guys” who are so bad that we can’t possibly become them. I do think we’ve gotten better at telling stories with complex evil, but the flip side is that seems to just reduce people’s resolve to act. Almost like the 2 options built into our brains are “us vs them, kill the evils ones” and “meh, corruption is inevitable, just ignore it”.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Shortstack@reddthat.com 139 points 1 day ago (16 children)

This comic illustrates my internal struggle to get along with my trump bootlicker coworkers.

I have to schmooze a little bit to keep the working relationship running, but I feel disgusted every single day when the little hints of what they stand for peek out.

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 25 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

So I’m going to share something agent_nycto said once, because it works very well on people like this:

I don't think you should be quiet, it makes them feel like everyone is agreeing with them and makes everyone miserable. Time to introduce you to my favorite game to play with conservatives, Politics Judo!

So you hear them rant about a thing. Some dumbass talking point. Let's use gun control. It's pretty easy to know in advance what the talking points are since they never shut up and parrot the same problem and solution over and over. "Shouldn't take guns, it's a mental problem not a gun problem".

Things are basically boiled down to a problem and a solution. A lot of people try to convince people that the problem isn't what people think it is, and that's hard to do. Even if they are just misinformed, it feels like trying to dismiss their fears.

So what you do is you agree with the problem, then use lefty talking points as the solution.

"Oh yeah, gun violence is pretty bad! And I love the Constitution, we shouldn't mess with that!" (Use small words and also throw in some patriotism, makes them feel like you're on their side. You want to sound like a right wing media con artist) "so instead of taking guns away, we should instead start having more, free, mental health care in this country. Since it's a mental health problem and these people are crazy, that is the solution that makes the most sense!" (Don't try to get them to agree to your solution, just state it as the obvious one)

It becomes weaponized cognitive dissonance. Their brains fry because you said the things you should to agree with them, flagged yourself as an ally, but then said the thing they were told is the bad and shouldn't want.

If they try to argue with your solution, rinse and repeat to a different talking point. "Oh yeah it might cost more, and we shouldn't have to pay more for it, so we should get the rich people who are screwing average hard working Americans over by not paying taxes to do that. We should shut down tax loopholes and increase funding to the IRS so they can go after them instead of the little guy"

Always sound like you're agreeing with them, but giving solutions that they disagree with that seem to be off topic but are related.

Either they will get flustered and stop, or they will slip up and say something racist or sexist or something, and then you can have HR bust them. Document it and also see if you're in a single party consent state.

[–] kender242@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago

The "yes and" method.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 13 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

i had a coworker who simped for trump and musk. we are not even from the us.

oh he also bragged he and part of his family estranged some close gay relative of his that really needed a lot of help from them once.

very in favor of the war on drugs, hated weed and the 'addict do-nothings', but did some dangerous pharmaceuticals he acquired somehow.

had the grindset mentality that i can see could potentially bring him to collapse if he keeps it up, on a place that already overworked its employees. barely slept and used said meds to work harder. theres probably more i could say but eh.

he was indeed nice though. said his pleases and thank yous, had his coworkers backs. he was generally easy to deal with and was relied upon because he knew his shit (but it probably cost a piece of himself)

i dont understand these people at all or how we normalized this... strangeness? i honestly can't really explain the surrealism of it. believe it or not that was tame for that workplace.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 57 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The guy excusing it is almost just as problematic. Just because you can act polite doesnt mean youre nice, but espousing these views isnt even polite. Having to pretend to get along with people like this at work is soul draining.

[–] gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

That's the joke and it's good you picked up on it.

People need to face the consequences of their beliefs within the circle of their loved ones. If that fails, the next social circle upwards like their friends. But right now it feels like even that has failed and now people are okay with letting awful beliefs fester in their neighbors because it's "politics". That's not okay, as this comic relies on.

load more comments
view more: next ›