this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
93 points (97.9% liked)

politics

26239 readers
2871 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Republican leaders have stuck to a straightforward position in their standoff with Democrats over government funding: No negotiations until the shutdown ends.

But as the impasse drags on, some rank-and-file Republicans are starting to wonder if it’s time to change tactics.

Several GOP lawmakers have suggested that Donald Trump take a more direct role in resolving the shutdown in recent days, including potentially opening up negotiations with Democrats if it’s what’s required to end the standoff.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FancyPantsFIRE@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago (2 children)

“Just give up your only leverage and we’ll talk about what you want. Pinky promise.”

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 12 points 1 week ago

Which is exactly what they said last spring, and then crickets. Fool me once ...

[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago

Well, it worked with Hamas

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No negotiations until the shutdown ends.

"Give in to our demands" is not 'negotiation.'

[–] Red_October@piefed.world 6 points 1 week ago

Yeah that's what they said, this isn't negotiation.

There also won't be any negotiation after the shutdown ends either, but that part is just taken as read.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 week ago

His only input on the negotiations so far has been : "don't negotiate with the Democrats"

So I'm not sure that's going to do anything to move the needle.

[–] JuBe@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Trump’s total disregard for the Impoundment Control Act, which basically requires the President to spend money that Congress has appropriated — and the acquiescence of Congressional Republicans to that executive overreach — is ample reason why Democrats have little reason to trust Republicans will do what they say.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago

"I'll only talk to the Democrats if the meeting is held in the middle of Fifth Avenue."

Why? He has no skills at negotiating

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

His cognitive decline will be more obvious than ever. That's why miller and Mike don't want it. They are the ones running things but they need trump around so that they can.

Vance has been licking butt his whole life to get to the top.

He won't be listening to anyone once he gets there. They know that too.

[–] TheHighRoad@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Craven traitors, the lot of them.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago

They want him to be the mean parent, so they can tell their constituents "I'd love to do something about your health insurance premiums tripling in price, but The Boss says No."

[–] Salamanderwizard@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I'm down for talking of shutting down his brain.

For research.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago
[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

"Help us continue to the very next move which will be a successful vote to release your appearances in the Epstein Files."