this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
800 points (99.4% liked)

politics

26308 readers
3095 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A society is always about 3 days of hunger away from a violent revolution. Start your clocks.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 258 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

But it's OK: Kristi Noem gets two $170,000,000 private jets, Trump gets a golden ballroom, a luxury airliner and billions of dollars in bribes, Argentina gets $40,000,000,000, and ICE get all the weaponry they desire plus big fat bonuses for hitting their kidnapping targets. So as you sit hungry through the holiday season, know that your tax dollars are at least giving someone a good time.

[–] imposedsensation@lemmynsfw.com 118 points 2 weeks ago

Don't forget the $250 million that he feels he is owed by the DOJ for being prosecuted, which he intends to instruct the DOJ to settle and pay.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Let's instead phrase it that ICE gets more budget for militarization than the entire Israeli military.

Just let that sink in for a bit. ICE and resources allocated than the Israeli military.

It's the 16th most funded militarized force in the world.

Essentially equal to Canada's military budget.

Shits fucked

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 199 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

Did somebody say Bell riots? I thought I heard Bell riots.

[–] KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world 84 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Star Trek future here we come, huzzah!

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 46 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Don't forget we have to do the Eugenics Wars first as well...

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 33 points 2 weeks ago

I’m sure Mark Twain will rescue me from those

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

As well as World War III killing a double digit percentage of the world population.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

That was after they created the Sanctuary Districts in major cities, like San Francisco. We're still a bit away from that. They're leaving the homeless to roam.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Zier@fedia.io 168 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Just a reminder that no one steals food in America. If you thought you saw someone shoplifting food, no you didn't! That never happened, you imagined it, turn around and walk away, nothing to report here.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 36 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not American, but I totally didn't see someone shoplifting a couple of weeks ago and I just carried on with my business, but on the way out I heard another customer grassing them out. What is the world coming to?

You know what you hardly ever see - billionaires telling on each other for their crimes for no reason. Solidarity, people!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 126 points 2 weeks ago (15 children)

Thing is, it's gonna hit the rural MAGA folks the hardest.

There's a part of me that wants to go "I told you so.." which is expected..

But the more cunning part of me wants to leverage their hunger, dismay and rage and work to aim it squarely against Trump and the entire MAGA movement.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 124 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

MAGA will blame the Ds and "libtards", because that's what they've been told to do.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Most of them will, but we don’t need most of them to tip the scales.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 50 points 2 weeks ago

Who isn’t? It’s the “Schumer shutdown” and what did they say on Fox News? Something like “open the government and then discuss”. They eat that shit up.

Who do you imagine is going to blame the republicans? Trump is untouchable because they’ll just invent some story to justify their blind faith.

Hell, I had a family member tell me “you got to read between the lines. Don’t take anything he says literally”

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago

Yup. Chomsky talked about the Angry White Man syndrome and how they were right to be angry, but they were angry at the wrong people.

Faux and other wingnut welfare outfits didn't run in the red for years on end (maybe some indefinitely) for no reason. All that infrastructure - Faux, Washington Times, hate radio, Regnery publishing, etc....is all there to properly indoctrinate a certain percentage of the population into believing all their problems are a result of anything else BUT Republican and conservative ideology.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'd like to have empathy, and publicly I won't call out these hypocrites, but I honestly can't care less if these fuckers starve. I feel bad for the children and helpless that are affected, but the others that voted for this are reaping what they sow.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, but "he's not hurting the people he needs to be hurting".

I try to have compassion for people that have made bad choices in their lives, but fucking hell, it is really hard to sustain that for people that voted to hurt other people. Actively wanting that to happen. Not to really improve their own lot in life, but to hurt others.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

use that to build class solidarity.

mocking them will achieve nothing except make you feel better

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 122 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Republicans don't give a fuck if they kill people by withholding healthcare, obviously they don't give a fuck if people starve.

At some point the Democrats have got to realize this and start acting accordingly, but Democrats are still bending the knee: 13 Senate Democrats just voted to install a conservative judge in Alabama.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

Republicans don’t give a fuck if they kill people by withholding healthcare, obviously they don’t give a fuck if people starve.

Maybe that's why they love Israel so much?

[–] sampao@lemmy.ml 80 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Not an American but if the government shutsdown and they are cancelling programs, shouldn't you not have to pay taxes for that time period?

[–] Demonmariner@lemmy.world 58 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Most working people have their estimated taxes deducted from their pay before they receive it. They don't have an option to not pay.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 48 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, that one congressional district that has their congress person being kept out should definitely not have to pay because that would be a taxation when they have no representation.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 47 points 2 weeks ago

Also, several congresspeople have said that they "don't represent the Democrats" in their districts. I think that, too, should immediately exempt those residents from taxes.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 55 points 2 weeks ago (23 children)

Fact: absolutely none of this would have happened if Kamala had won.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 51 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This administration needs to be concerned about what happens when you have millions of people with nothing to lose anymore.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

yhea they want escalation.

but that doesn't mean the best strategy is to do nothing.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 43 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

What the fuck. I know Republicans despise poor people and think they can just magically pick themselves up by their own bootstraps, but... People still need to eat! We obviously have to! Hoping no one I know is hurt in the upcoming riots and crime.

In the meantime, please consider donating to food banks and nonprofit organizations, since apparently none of our tax dollars will go to helping those less fortunate...

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 36 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

People still need to eat! We obviously have to!

Eat the rich?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 42 points 2 weeks ago (19 children)

Can any Americans explain to me, a Canadian, how it makes sense for essential services like food benefits to be suspended just because your government can't get their shit together?

Like, genuine question here; how is this is a good system? How does your country benefit from things being designed this way? I'm not saying we don't ever have political deadlock in Canada, we most certainly do, but even as someone who gets half my household income from the military, I've never had to worry about a missed paycheck just because politicians are being stupid. We have failsafes for that. Why don't you?

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So, many many years ago, there was a system where when a bill was passed, that meant it got funded. Simple and sweet. Actually it wasn't that sweet, because Nixon was refusing to spend money that the law required the U.S. government to spend, similar to what Trump is doing today.

The current system is generally based on the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974. There have been many small and large changes since, but the structure basically goes back to that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In a sensible country, the government would continue to spend at the levels of the previous budget in the event of a delay in negotiating the renewed budget. It makes no sense. There are no benefits. Please do what you did in 1814 again we need it.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

We don’t even need to go burn the white house down again, he tore it down himself.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

Good we should stop paying our taxes.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago

Very Christ-like.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm a Free Thinker Who Does Her Own Research Republican using SNAP and if the DEMONRATS let this happen I'll be FURIOUS and VIOLENT towards THEM and THEM only (because Fox News TOLD me to!)!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

Good, it is completely unnecessary. It's a bad solution to an old problem that already has much better solutions out there that are much more accessible too. They only made it so people will rely on them for everything and stop trusting others, but thankfully it failed. Canonical should be ashamed of themselves for ever trying this snap thing.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I wonder how many people on SNAP voted for the pedo-in-chief.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Like half of my friends are overt leftists who rely partially or fully on SNAP benefits, and they all voted against Trump. And I'm really worried about them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aarch0x40@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] SpacePanda@mander.xyz 20 points 2 weeks ago

Soon in their fancy ballroom. Sound like a situation the French were in back in the day.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And with only one week for people to prepare. Smooth.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (10 children)

Best case scenario, this gives communities the push they need to step up mutual aid efforts.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] daannii@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's mostly going to be the elderly who suffer. People just forget about old people. They can't get out and go stand in line at food pantries.

Sometimes they don't have anyone checking on them very often.

Most don't know how to get online and find services and such.

If you have an elderly neighbor or family member. Try to check with them and see if they need help.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›