this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
811 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

77197 readers
2609 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In late October, Elon Musk released a Wikipedia alternative, with pages written by his AI chatbot Grok. Unlike its nearly quarter-century-old namesake, Musk said Grokipedia would strip out the “woke” from Wikipedia, which he previously described as an “extension of legacy media propaganda.” But while Musk’s Grokipedia, in his eyes, is propaganda-free, it seems to have a proclivity toward right-wing hagiography.

Take Grokipedia’s entry on Adolf Hitler. Until earlier this month, the entry read, “Adolf Hitler was the Austrian-born Führer of Germany from 1933 to 1945.” That phrase has been edited to “Adolf Hitler was an Austrian-born German politician and dictator,” but Grok still refers to Hitler by his honorific one clause later, writing that Hitler served as “Führer und Reichskanzler from August 1934 until his suicide in 1945.” NBC News also pointed out that the page on Hitler goes on for some 13,000 words before the first mention of the Holocaust.

Archive: http://archive.today/aEcz0

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 hours ago

Do not get the point here. He did in fact and historically used that name. So we are deleting history now because we are not supposed like Hitler or Elon?

Stalin was a mass murderer, so was Mao, yet they also went by some nicer names. No one has ever raised a serious issue about that.

I do not think anyone here is denying that Hitler was a National Socialist.

Slow news day, I guess.

[–] lefthandeddude@lemmy.dbzer0.com 69 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (12 children)

Musk is clearly a Nazi.

First, there's the Nazi salute. There's no reason to do that unless you are a Nazi.

Second, Nazis called Hitler my Furer, and he's rewriting it this way specifically for this reason. It is an honorific title and he's showing honor to Hitler.

Third, Musk deflects from accusations he's a Nazi ("that's a crazy thing to say") but he never responds by saying "What Hitler did was horrible and I'm not a Nazi and detest their ideology" which is what someone would say if not a Nazi.

The scary thing about this is Musk will soon control a large robot army. At that point, he could appoint white supremacists to lead the robot army and pick up where Hitler left off. This is a real threat for Jewish people as well as other minorities.

[–] patatahooligan@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Third, Musk deflects from accusations he’s a Nazi (“that’s a crazy thing to say”) but he never responds by saying “What Hitler did was horrible and I’m not a Nazi and detest their ideology” which is what someone would say if not a Nazi.

This is the most important point, IMO. Fascists who want mainstream acceptance know not to have swastika tattoos and not to openly say they love Hitler. They will always try to have some plausible deniability. Don't get dragged into their bullshit arguments. There's no point in debating whether the nazi salute was some other motion that was misinterpreted. Even if it was, the first thing a non-nazi would do would be to clarify that they are not a nazi and don't want nazis to think they're their allies. Even if Musk had completely inadvertently stumbled upon the love and support of the nazis via a series of misunderstandings (lol), at this point in time he is deliberately choosing to be part of them.

Here is Musk at 3:08:01 saying he's not a nazi... and then going on to say you're not a nazi unless you're literally invading Poland and doing the holocaust. That is literally the only objectionable thing about the nazis. Not their "fashion sense or mannerisms". Yes that was a direct quote. There is really only one type of person that would not mention as objectionable the nazi ideology or all the acts of violence that are not at the same scale as the holocaust.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

He's just an edgelord. He thinks he's funny and edgy and everyone wants to be his friend. Inside he's a scared little boy who wants his daddy to love him but his daddy is a nazi who hates him.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 29 points 4 days ago (6 children)

do you know that you can an edglord doing nazi shit? a nazi. no matter the motivation, he's still a nazi.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] IonTempted@lemmynsfw.com 33 points 4 days ago (14 children)

Thanks for reminding me to leave a donation on Wikipedia, seriously if we lose Wikipedia we are fucked.

[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Your money is better spent on archive.org

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 184 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

The man can literally afford to have a legal harem island, fund an entertainment company to create anything to amuse him, AND solve world hunger simultaneously...and he just fawns over Hitler.

His wealth is truly wasted.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 40 points 4 days ago

Most of the world's wealth is wasted under capitalism.

[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 48 points 5 days ago

He enjoys the smell of his own farts and believes other people will as well.

[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Apparently owning the libs, snorting ketamine to the point of pissing yourself and dick jokes are more important than anything you mentioned.

Also Donald Trump needs a lot of money. The other tech dickheads bending over backwards are not enough.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

But Elon is not a nazi! All he did was give out his heart to the crowd in a roman salut!

You're not going to complain about a heartfelt roman salut, are you? That would be woke!

[–] TassieTosser@aussie.zone 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What's the difference between this garbage and Conservapedia?

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Conservapedia is worse, remarkably.

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not that remarkable, Grokipedia is largely plagiarized from Wikipedia whereas Conservapedia is fully hand-written by a bunch of idiots.

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 3 points 3 days ago

Artisanal idiocy.

[–] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

this one's written by AI! how exciting and transformative! world changing!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Everything that fascist touches becomes corrupted and useless

[–] Zink@programming.dev 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So the space obsessed man-child generated his own stupid encyclopedia, and for this generous all-giving knowledge resource he chooses a stylized BLACK HOLE for the logo.

It feels like the nerd equivalent to that quote about how the anti-semite arguing in bad faith enjoys seeing others frustrated by their hypocrisy. Here lemme just find that pasta...

Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.

Jean-Paul Sartre

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 3 days ago

hes actually sex-obsessed with breeder fetish, the space thing is a cover for this.

[–] greenbelt@lemy.lol 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It will be cited as a valid source for presentations at schools around the world lol

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 2 points 3 days ago

"Grok, is this true?"

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 104 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (15 children)

I mean the whole stupid Grokipedia thing is a shit show that will never take off, but Fuhrer is just "leader" in German. In it's used context for Hitler it straight up means dictator and (iirc) only came into full on use after the plebiscite giving him full dictatorial power after Hindenburg's death in 1934 (edit: He was already the Reich's Chancellor and merged in Hindenburg's powers with the vote to make himself full dictator / Fuhrer).

I'd welcome input from a German national - Is the word still used there?

[–] dukemirage@lemmy.world 154 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Führer is not just „leader“, it is tainted and using it as a substitute for Hitler in a factual text is super weird, like casually calling Jesus in his Wikipedia article „our lord and savior“ now and then.

[–] OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world 34 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Thank you for this comparison. That's a fun one and one that's made a little more 'subtle' in the US if only because of how common that language is among the populace in regions and how pervasive protestantism is in advertising/messaging.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 36 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Jesus would've hated America. I think according to the bible he lost his shit twice - both because of capitalism.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 41 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Not German but moved to Germany. The word is still a normal word, it can be used, only in certain contexts not.

To me it is very very weird.

Especially in a comboword there is 0,0 issue: Reiseführer, Bergführer, etc. The no go zone seems very subtle to me, it's more about pronunciation and context, not the word itself. Especially the word "Führerschein" is super weird to me when used in regular conversations. I automatically hear translated "license to be the Führer", but it just means driver's license and nothing else and no one finds it weird.

[–] RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works 38 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Exactly this. If you use it as part of a compound word or as a verb it's totally fine. However "der Führer" (the Führer) is exclusively used to describe Hitler, and it usually has a negative or ironic vibe depending on who says it.

About the Führerschein... führen and fahren have the same etymological root... It is still used in "Führen eines Fahrzeugs" which simply means "driving a car" and that is where the term comes from.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 35 points 5 days ago (10 children)

Why would they use the honorary, German word Fuhrer in an English language wiki article though?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] klay1@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

German here: you can use "Führer" only with specific other context. There could be for example "Gruppenführer" -> the leader of a group. Or "Anführer" -> could be the elder of a tribe. If you clearly use it in a neutral context, no problem.

But if you use it just like that, it will immediately raise concern if you really meant to say it this way.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 50 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Man calls unbiased site biased, releases biased site to replace unbiased site.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago

Grokipedia would strip out the “woke” from Wikipedia

So are they removing the pages on Insomnia?

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 41 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I wonder how (or if) grokopedia defines "woke"?

Most of the people who complain about "the woke" arent able to define it.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 43 points 5 days ago (10 children)

Not sure if you heard but according to the CEO of Palantir in an interview he gave a few weeks ago, there is now "woke left" and "woke right."

Basically anybody on the right who wakes up and smells the bullshit in the narrative is "woke." Like if you believe in those "crazy conspiracy theories" that say Palantir is up to some evil villain shit, you're woke.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 44 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (9 children)

Conservapedia already did this something like twenty years ago. It missed the entire purpose of the project, which was to invite a kaleidoscope of specialists and journalists to document the volume of known information categorically, primarily through citation to other online works.

Instead, you had a basket case of ultra-orthodox ideologues carving out a very niche set of contrary opinion posts that weren't well documented or continuously maintained.

Conservapedia isn't a right wing vanity project because of it's hot takes on Hitler, it's a vanity project because of the yawning gulfs in it's data set. Nobody engages with the site, because it is so heavily censored.

I get the sense Grokapedia will suffer the same fate. If a subject doesn't tickle Musk's interest, it'll either go undocumented or be a naked plagarization of some other online encyclopedia. And as soon as Musk loses interest entirely, support for the service will go the same way as so many private vanity projects.

Incidentally, Wikipedia's fate is also an open question. What happens when Jimmy Wales can't administer and fundraise for it anymore? How long until some hacks get their hooks in and corrupt it like so many other private media outlets?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Simply put, Leon Hitler is a shitbag neo-Nazi.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 30 points 5 days ago

I don't believe Elon sees any of this honestly. In his eyes, this is what it is: racist and highly propogandized bullshit. This is because Elon is a racist, highly politically bias asshole.

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 28 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I just watched a tech video that reviewed two North Korean smartphones. Its autocorrect assertively blocks out or autoreplaces anything deemed unfit by the government, along with absolute control of what can be done on it, and absolute fingerprinting of anything sent.

I was reminded of this for no reason.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›