A key theme across the reports is the feedback loop that enables conspiracy narratives to circulate. Even when politicians or media outlets refer to a conspiracy theory to debunk it, the resulting attention helps it spread further via social media amplification and mainstream exposure. This blurring of online and offline spaces allows fringe ideas to influence political rhetoric, as seen in Europe-wide variations of the “Great Replacement” narrative.
Exactly why you shouldn't post every crazy thing a far right politician says. "Any publicity is good publicity" after all. Fuck "staying informed", you know they're a liar and a scumbag so why stay informed on every bullshit thing they say?
If they're in power it's perhaps different because staying informed could mean understanding changing government policies. But when they're an opposition politician, especially if they're not the 2nd most powerful party, ignore them. Deprive them of clicks, engagement, and publicity.
Don't discuss the crazy shit because that begins to normalise the crazy shit.