this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
964 points (97.4% liked)

Bluesky

1181 readers
24 users here now

People skeeting stuff.

Bluesky Social is a microblogging social platform being developed in conjunction with the decentralized AT Protocol. Previously invite-only, the flagship Beta app went public in February 2024. All are welcome!

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

each person would have that exactly once... over time the concentration would happen again

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So if that's the median, you need about half a million to be considered "Middle class" now?

Looks at housing prices... Yeah, sounds about right.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Incorrectly conflating class with income level is exactly why working class Americans have believed they’re “middle class” for decades.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (8 children)

Except the wealth you're talking about is ownership, not actual money. Redistributing it won't give everybody a pile of Scrooge McDuck coins, it will give them stocks and other asset ownership worth half a million. To spend any of that, they would have to sell shares to somebody for cash and spend the cash, which they can only do once. After a flurry of liquidating and spending, you'd end up with a lot of people who have more stuff but are otherwise back where they were, and other people who spend less and gradually accumulate a ton of shares to become rich.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] the_q@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

$400 million would allow me to build a tiny house completely off grid with all the equipment I'd need to grow vegetables in a remote location for the rest of my life... The other $398 would go to helping anyone and everyone.

Misread the amount but leaving up as a reminder of my idiocy.

[–] essell@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sorry, you only get $400 thousand, not $400 million.

[–] the_q@lemm.ee 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Geeze... I really can't read today.

To be fair, you could do that on 400k if you’re willing to be very frugal and handy.

I mean I know lots of people in the US who survive on 10k a year.

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 4 points 3 days ago

Wealth is good and all, but the companies involved also lead to products being more expensive, that wealth would go a lot farther with either regulations on land ownership or total reform of land ownership, free universities, universal healthcare, zoning reform and work reform

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›