this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
215 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

70461 readers
2507 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Can browsers block recall recording as well?

I'll add that to every site manage

Let recall literally record only black boxes, fuck Microsoft

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Given this reality, private messaging apps like Signal deserve to be treated with at least the same level of caution that’s afforded to a web browser’s private or incognito browsing window — which Microsoft has already excluded from Recall by default.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

I'd like it to be an HTTP header that will blacken the browser for recall. I don't want recall to look at my banking website, just as an example.

Hell, I don't want Recall, period, but I mean, if I managed a banking site, I'd want to know that a million customers aren't inadvertently feeding their private banking info to some shitty AI

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They can, but this wouldn't be a website thing, it'd be the whole browser. Not a bad thin, IMO, Recall is cancer that no one but Microsoft board members & investors are asking for.

I predict privacy-preserving browsers like Librewolf, Waterfox, etc. potentially deploying the same "DRM for a good cause" approach Signal is using.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It could be something that websites could then tell the browser using a header or meta tag

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I'd still want the browser to at least be able to do it as a default, not at the whim of specific sites.

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I didn’t realize an app could do that. Won’t most apps just make it an option or enforce blocking recall?

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 56 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What Signal is doing is a workaround specifically used for DRM content. This feature is specifically so you can't copy copyrighted content. I don't think most apps would do this.

According to Microsoft, Recall is opt in. I don't fucking trust them though.

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I agree that they can’t be trusted. I’m getting a Mac this fall to switch away from windows.

Sadly, my work can’t be done on Linux yet. I keep checking though. I’m really just waiting for a single app.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Dropped windows for Linux

[–] Phen@lemmy.eco.br 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So I guess it'll probably block screenshots too?

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

Opt in probably just means you can't view the results of recall 🫠

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago