this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
138 points (98.6% liked)

politics

27110 readers
3156 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 63 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Going after a decorated vet and former astronaut for reminding servicemembers of their oaths.

Do they want Kelly to be President?

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 1 week ago

It treat it like the Marines do. You're never a "former" astronaut once you earn the title. That's an accomplishment that a fraction of a fraction of humans currently alive will ever achieve.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 55 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It still gets me every time that this idiot, Kegsbreath, is still so determined to go after Kelly for simply reciting the UCMJ. Pathetic.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 55 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There is an expression the police use when they arrest you even though they know that they can't keep you.

"You can beat the charge, but you can't beat the ride."

Dragging Senator Kelly is the point regardless of the results.

That coupled with the apocryphal quote "If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him." should show why they are continuing their pursuit.

[–] VeryVito@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 week ago

Alcoholic, latent, dangerously stupid and belligerently ignorant: Hegseth is the perfect face for this administration. It amazes me that he can’t see that he’s being set up to take the fall for all of these crimes.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tell me you were planning to commit war crimes without saying you were planning to commit war crimes.

Although, they've also come out and bragged about doing things that are war crimes.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 14 points 1 week ago

It's as if MAGA Republicans think they're poised for world domination or something.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Attacking free speech. Ffs. I am holding on to hope that this will not end bad.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It won’t stop until all the Nazis are dead.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Sadly, it goes beyond them.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

People in here acting like Hegseth is being stupider than he is.

This is not about Kelly. Kelly may win a lawsuit, or more likely will settle, or some terrible extrajudicial fate may befall him.

Regardless, the message sent is crystal clear: none of the US military riff-raff can afford Kelly's lawyers. If you are employed by the U.S. military, you either unconditionally act as Supreme Leader D.J. Trump's personal militia in all matters up to and including shooting down peaceful protesters, or you spend the rest of your life in the brig, because the rule of law does not exist anymore.

Hegseth knows it, the military officers know it, the SCotUS loves it, the MSM pretends otherwise. That's the state of affairs and Hegseth is merely making it clear for the crayon eaters in the back.

I'd love to be proven wrong, but on the short list of potential good outcomes for 2026, the U.S. military taking a stand against tyranny is nowhere in there.

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Why? We had enough traitors in the military to go through with the illegal invasion of Venezuela.