this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
15 points (85.7% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !space@mander.xyz

10583 readers
1 users here now

This community is dormant, please find us at !space@mander.xyz

You can find the original sidebar contents below:


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

🔭 Science

🚀 Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] i_have_no_enemies@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I mean maybe, I don't know. You're likely to crush whoever is in the vehicle trying to go that fast. Humans can only handle very low g-acceleration.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Thinking about it, a fusion rocket makes sense. The difficulty with building a fusion reactor is containing the plasma, but with a rocket you want the plasma to escape. It sounds much easier.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Is this real? Or has somebody debunked this? It sounds a bit sketchy with the recent woo-woo science scams, and with the CEO Richard Dinan not having any degree or even finishing high school.

Fundamentally it might be possible to have a non sustainable fusion reaction that requires more energy in than out, but that produces great impulse. But I haven't found anything that explains how it's done. And then the question becomes how they supply the power needed to do fusion and direct the output into one direction.