this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
184 points (93.8% liked)

Games

44994 readers
232 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 89 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Video games aren’t supposed to be realistic, they’re supposed to be fun

Sure, but exploring the way games abstract reality can be interesting and worthwhile.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago

realistic is sometimes fun

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 days ago

Noo I want to spend 50 years before I can have a second well!

[–] DonAntonioMagino@feddit.nl 70 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’s still interesting to analyse them like the cultural products they are.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 days ago

Yeah, examining the ways they are inaccurate tells us a lot about ourselves.

[–] IlovePizza@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Simulator then?

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

You can do all sorts of things with video games, even when sticking to realism, if it helps you achieve your goals.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Default difficulty... Certain wiping out of every living being in your village, and failure. Conclusions in article are fairly poor as they are "games are already designed smartly, and there's nothing that should be changed."

A good game concept would be to put the player as a "middle manager" with feudal lord as the client. The mission is how to best oppress the villagers in order to graduate to better employment: managing a bigger city.

[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 52 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Written in 2020 but still an interesting read. I wonder what the author thinks of games that have released in the intervening years, like Manor Lords, Going Medieval, and Farthest Frontier?

[–] RipLemmDotEE@lemmy.today 20 points 2 days ago

Well, it looks like someone did an interview with a medieval historian about Manor Lords.

https://youtu.be/KS56GUgb-08

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

I am looking forward to Manor Lords when it gets released. Been tracking it for years.

[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pretty insightful. Key takeaways:

  1. linear growth didn't really happen like that
  2. pre-planning would be good
  3. experience of tax collectors skimming the surplus, plus hazards of rural life.
[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, I thought life was hard but sustainable mostly, turns out one was always at risk of extinction:

Medieval villagers were often living on the edge of subsistence. Agricultural surpluses were skimmed by the church and the feudal lords. Bad harvests, banditry, warfare and disease might decimate a village community at any time. For this very reason, the demography of many European villages remained relatively stable between the twelfth and the eighteenth century.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

If I remember Devereaux, the village itself was set up to minimise that risk first and foremost, at the expense of optimisation for max yields. So, every year was around subsistence, never much above, but also never much lower.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

relatively stable between the twelfth and the eighteenth century

Hm... wasn't there like a 33% dip back in the fourteenth, not counting subsequent migration to the cities and whatnot..?

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't know, we need a medievalist here

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, there was that little thing called the black death, if I recall correctly...

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

Ah, yeah, there was, that's not how most of the time went, though

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is a great article! It's really interesting.

I have two comments to make, and I hope nobody thinks this is me trying to disagree with the article or something, I don't want it to come across as defensive. In explaining some of the challenges medieval cities go through and saying Banished is a pretty accurate game, I think this might just be a genre issue. I consider Banished a colony management game, not a city builder, and indeed, in colony management games your people's health and safety are usually a much larger concern than in a city builder.

The second comment is that the writer suggests a game with flood mechanics and arable farm land. I don't remember if it was out in March of 2020, but Timberland is out now. It's a beaver based colony management game that includes a lot of fluid dynamics. It has flood mechanics like described. It's unrealistic, of course, because they're beavers. But also because flooding isn't the end of the world if it gets into your buildings, I think it's more of an inconvenience. Regardless, I think it's a cool game to check out.

[–] Agent_Karyo@piefed.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am a big fan of Timberborn, but if we go all pedantic about it, Timberborn's flood mechanics aren't all that realistic.

A game that came somewhat close to realistic flood mechanics was Pharaoh/Cleopatra (1999/2000). Even though it used an abstract/statistical model (due to the technical limitations of the time), it felt a lot closer to reality than Timberborn even if there were some gamey elements like how well you respected Osiris.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

I'm not saying they're realistic, just that it has some of the flood/farming mechanics the blog author wanted to see in a game.

[–] EarMaster@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well then I guess the Wolfenstein games aren't historically accurate either…?

What a shock!