this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

memes

15363 readers
4246 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] redditReallySucks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Maybe they can stop paying their CEO 7 million per year

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That CEO quit earlier this year.

[–] acutfjg@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Maybe they can stop paying the next CEO 7 million

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Maybe that CEO will also quit, because other companies offer them a higher salary.

It's so easy to say they should just pay their CEO less. I mean, I get it, it's a ridiculous amount of money that no one needs. But few people, who are qualified for that job, will just do it out of the goodness of their hearts for a salary far below industry standards.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

This is predicated on the assumption that a CEOs skill is directly related to their salary.

This may or may not be the case.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Mozilla chose a stupid business model. 🤷

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Maybe that's not bad for firefox.

Maybe less money means less ridiculous side projects and just focus on delivering a good browser.

Algo the lack of google as financial support means they'll rely more on donations, which would mean that they really need to focus on offering a good browser.

I'll gladly donate to firefox if I would see they are really focusing on it.

[–] TehBamski@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

If I had the money, an extra $5 or so would definitely be something I'd spend monthly on donating to Mozilla/Firefox.

[–] _edge@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • Mozilla will take money from Microsoft
  • Firefox gets Office 365, Exchange, and Azure AD integration
  • Netflix partners with Microsoft for advanced HD and DRM
  • Microsoft and Mozilla partner to deliver Microsoft-enhanced Firefox for Windows
  • ActiveX 2.0
[–] quinkin@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I upvoted you but I wasn't happy about it.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 10 months ago

I had a good chuckle at how well that all came together.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Okay, Satan.

[–] nichtburningturtle@feddit.org 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Mozilla chose to waste most of it.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Right? I don't need AI BS. I just want a solid browser.

[–] nichtburningturtle@feddit.org 1 points 10 months ago

What do you mean, you don't want an opt-out ad tracker?

[–] datelmd5sum@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I hope Mozilla put most of that Google money into index funds or something. At least it didn't go into paying the developers.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I haven't confirmed this but according to this

They didn't