this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Games

21073 readers
69 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShadowCat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Based.

Though I would 100% be fine with paying for Stardew DLC, the base game is worth so much more than its current price

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I have bought it twice, possibly on sale both times but still. I’d never heard of it, and I’d never played any style of game like that, but Nintendo advertised it to me when it launched on the Switch and I eventually bought it. Later my family started taking the Switch more and I eventually bought it again in Steam. No regrets! Happy to support good games from small developers that don’t break the bank!

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The sad part is that the idea behind DLCs (to develop further content for a game already released, in exchange for additional money) is reasonable. Or it would be, if shitty developers didn't abuse it to the point that it stopped being "downloadable content" to become "dumb and lazy cashgrab".

I also think that CA isn't just being benign with this statement, or his whole "let us not be arseholes" approach towards development. He's being smart; player trust might be hard to measure but it has direct impact on word-of-mouth advertisement and piracy, so it's basically the difference between "everybody knows it, plenty bought it" and "the few ones who know it pirated it".

[–] 50MYT@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Another excellent example of this working is Factorio.

The original game doesn't cost a fortune, it's made by a small extremely dedicated team. They polished it so hard the shine made everything else look like vanta black. Playing Factorio ruins other games because the depth and quality of everything else is so poor in comparison.

The game came out in like 2013 early access. Full release completed in 2020. A decade after initial launch, they are going to offer a DLC, that will cost money.

Absolutely happy to pay for a DLC for that perfection.

[–] at_an_angle@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not happy to pay money for that DLC.

Are you kidding me? Already have 1400 hours in the game. And if this DLC is gonna double the base game, I'm screwed.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah factorio doesn't cost money, it costs you years of your life

[–] Album@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

30 million copies sold. even if he only made a dollar into his pocket for each sale....hes doing alright.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

But I have absolutely no problem with that whatsoever. Dude wrote a good, solid, complete game, sold it for a fair price, and made bank. That is the business model I want software to be sold under, and I'm thrilled to see it working for him.