this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
543 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

70528 readers
4092 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Nick Clegg, former Meta executive and UK Deputy Prime Minister, has reiterated a familiar line when it comes to AI and artist consent.
  • He said that any push for consent would “basically kill” the AI industry.
  • Clegg added that the sheer volume of data that AI is trained on makes it “implausible” to ask for consent.
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dumbpotato@lemmy.cafe 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Rules for thee, not for me.

I thought copyright and patent laws were supposed to protect the little guy? Looks like as soon as they protect the little guy from big business, they stop mattering.

It's almost like, they weren't there to protect the little guy which is why big businesses never fought back against them.

I guess the useful idiots were wrong, again. Color me not-surprised.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago

Also Clegg

asking women for permission would ruin my sexlife.

probably.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 6 days ago

AI is not just limited to these overhyped plagiarism machines. Will consent laws kill vision systems? Will they kill classifiers? Will they kill gradient descent? No, they won't.

[–] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 10 points 6 days ago
[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow? No, says the man on Wall Street; it belongs to the shareholders.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 5 days ago

Is a man not entitled to the sweat of ALL the brows?

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (6 children)

If I had a gun with 3 bullets and I was in a room with Meta, Hitler and Bin Laden. I would shoot Meta thrice.

[–] DrownedRats@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

I would shoot hitler twice, then bin laden, then beat meta to death with the gun because it would hurt more.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Benchamoneh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

If an industry can't survive without resorting to copyright theft then maybe it's not a viable business.

Imagine the business that could exist if only they didn't have to pay copyright holders. What makes the AI industry any different or more special?

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago
[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I’m not a fan of intellectual property law. I’m down to abandon it, once we establish an artist stipend to pay a regular salary for artists to live a life of dignity.

Maybe introduce a tax on AI to pay for it.

[–] mPony@kbin.earth 5 points 6 days ago

yeah a 110% tax

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 days ago (4 children)

How did the media industey call pirates? Parasites?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

He admit it!

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Well the AI companies and investors should have understood that building an industry off of doing something questionable was risky and risks don't always work out.

Yay, kill it please.

[–] HakunaHafada@lemm.ee 9 points 6 days ago
[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I doubt it. With that $500 billion dollar grant, you can hire people to make art to train on. That's a LOT of money.

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What makes you think that they'd do that?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 days ago

Ah, if it isn’t my old friend Mr. Nick Clegg, with a dick for a face and an ass for a head!

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 8 points 6 days ago

[tardigrade_violin.jpg]

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 6 days ago (3 children)

It’s implausible that I would pay for Netflix, Disney+, Paramount+, etc.

When I can just build a server and buy a VPN connection.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Ha... He was the Lib Dem poster boy for a good decade. And they're something akin to pro-business libertarians. I wonder what Lib Dem Dep PM Clegg would have said to this!

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

He was the poster boy because he managed to rise to the rank of completely irrelevant, the highest level of office any lib dem has ever achieved.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 4 points 5 days ago

Fine then, kill it.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

file under: “unsurprising capitalist takes”

Come on Disney! Use your god tier copyright lawyers and stop this AI shit for good.

[–] sircac@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago
[–] Siresly@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago

Well let's hope it will.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›