this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
317 points (98.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

30162 readers
1448 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

"In the fast-paced world of artificial intelligence, I'm constantly finding new ways to harness the power of technology. One of the most captivating aspects of AI models like GPT is their ability to "hallucinate" – generating completely new ideas and concepts that go beyond mere data processing. This capability underscores AI's potential to create, not just analyze."

First time I am seeing someone sell hallucination as a "feature not a bug"

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

GitHub could ban a lot of bots of they took a close look at that repo and who starred it. Bet they will. Mmhmm. Yup. Any time now.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

~24000 stars as of now. Stars might possibly be bots too or techbros on AI overdrive

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No project legitimately gets that many stars while having so few issues open

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 1 points 12 hours ago

It is true when the repo is of consequence. Repos with ~20K stars generally have ~1000 open issues. But I assume even if not bots, people starring this could be trigger happy from AI coding and star everything that is related to vibe coding.

[–] ns1@feddit.uk 183 points 5 days ago (4 children)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 41 points 4 days ago

Closed as not planned

so much brainrot they burned themselves on accident

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 37 points 4 days ago

For those wondering, yes, that was a real issue submitted. There are other issues, and they are great.

[–] markz@suppo.fi 34 points 5 days ago
[–] ulterno@programming.dev 11 points 4 days ago

Owner does not plan on getting their brain to function properly

[–] horn_e4_beaver@discuss.tchncs.de 103 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Privacy-First: No cameras required - uses WiFi signals for pose detection

That's not how privacy works.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

We won't film you having sex, we will just know that you are having sex, at what time and whether if on the bed or on the kitchen counter. Oh and we can also map the poses you prefer but that is fine.

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I'm fairly certain that the account is run by a bot and every single repo and line of code and text (readme, comments, etc.) are LLM slop. It's also probably part of a much larger bot network. Possibly an AI company experimenting with their latest slop-bots.

[–] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 91 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (6 children)

I have a visceral "AI" sensor that triggers when I see these:

"Rust Implementation (v2)"

"Performance Benchmarks (Validated)"

Human beings don't self-validate explicitly like that. AI loves doing it.

You generate code, there's a bug, you ask for a fix, your AI of choice will always output with:

*** Fix build issue ***

*** End fix ***

and then call it "Version 2 (Validated)".

Sometimes it's more subtle, but you can feel it, it loves adding "confirmed", "working", "validated".

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

👉: mission acquired

👊: bugs squashed

👍: code validated

👏: congratulations on this exquisite piece of software

✍️: ready to do more!

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 57 points 5 days ago (3 children)

My sensor is much simpler. If I see emoji in headings or bulleted lists, I assume it's shit. It might be AI slop, or it might just be kids getting overexcited with the little pictures, but both deserve suspicion and scrutiny.

If a bunch of the emoji don't even make sense it can get in the bin.

[–] GreyCat@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Ahhh idk, I saw a lot of genuine repos do emojis, at least for headings. Even before LLMs.

I like them 'cause with the right amount, it makes a README easier to parse when quickly scrolling over it.

[–] yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago

My changelog generation tools output emojis because our lives are too short to not use 🚀

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago

As an ancient husk of a person, it all looks crack-addled to me. I don't really see how you can parse out headings from emoji because their usage isn't consistent.

[–] eskuero@lemmy.fromshado.ws 38 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This comment is so true 🚀🚀🚀

[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I like putting the little pictures in my readmes sometimes. In my biologically generated repositories. Please don't discriminate against neat little pictures you can just put in text 🐑.

[–] isosphere@beehaw.org 2 points 2 days ago

me too!

admittedly imo they are being overused now though

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago

Your whimsy hurts me

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 60 points 5 days ago

This comment has been confirmed and validated by an actual human being 👍

[–] BenjiRenji@feddit.org 3 points 3 days ago

"I'm confident in my solution."

Alarm bells.

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

I have a project with a bunch of compose files that define the services I self host. I "deploy" the project by sshing into my server and doing "git pull" which means I'm often making changes that don't get tested before committing to source control. As a result I have long chains of commits like:

  • refactor the sproingy widget
  • refactor the sproingy widget v2
  • refactor the sproingy widget working
  • maybe the sproingy widget works this time?
  • ok finally found the issue with refactor sproingy widget
  • fix formatting of sproingy widget

And now I'm wondering if I've been an llm this whole time

[–] housedogpartyfavor@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 days ago

No the AI would have called it fixed, “production-ready,” committed, and pushed after the first refactor.

[–] exu@feditown.com 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Make your changes in a new branch and rebase/squash when you push it to main.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

Let me introduce you to Ansible

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 30 points 4 days ago

Forgot to put "make sure the project compiles" in his .md files. What an amateur.

[–] Xylight@lemdro.id 32 points 4 days ago (2 children)

anyone gonna cop the $1500 hour session for agentic engineering

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 55 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

I am no programmer and understand almost nothing of the documentation and yet somehow I can tell it's all bullshit.

It reads like a kid making up words in an attempt to sound smart mixed up with the description for a shady Amazon product.

[–] markz@suppo.fi 27 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I guess it's reading comprehension. Utter bullshit reeks the same regardless of the field.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fnrir@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 4 days ago

My impostor syndrome suddenly vanished :)

[–] SGforce@lemmy.ca 44 points 5 days ago

All of YC got bamboozled by this slop.

[–] Bazell@lemmy.zip 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Apparently, these stars indicate that this is a good joke.

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I mean well before AI, it was pretty common that a GitHub repo wouldn't compile.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 4 days ago

Maybe it's just me but most times I try to compile a software project from source, it's gonna take a long time figuring out stuff not mentioned in the readme and I will probably give up in the end.

[–] gkaklas@lemmy.zip 32 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Throughput metrics

Phase Sanitization 67-85 Melem/s

😆

(Turns out it does exist! But it's just a chemical https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melem )

[–] idunnololz@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 4 points 3 days ago
[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Everyone’s talking about the different things that give it away and here I am with “WiFi dense human pose…” wtf

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

You can track/identify people in range of a wifi router based on how the wifi signal is disrupted.

I believe that the original people claimed you could ID individual people using their approach, but I suspect that's under ideal conditions and/or with some training against individual people.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago (5 children)

And this is why I come up with stupid concepts like this, coding without numbers, just to fuck up artificial intelligence...

https://lemmy.world/post/43158470

Sorry I said it was Friday, it was actually Sunday 🤦‍♂️

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Performance Benchmarks (Validated) yup, 100% totally validated. It's like when you buy something thats wayy too cheap for what it should be off of Temu and it shows up with a QC and Validation card that they clearly just print on a large sheet and cut down that says QC OK

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] exu@feditown.com 14 points 5 days ago

"production ready" sure you are

[–] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Welp, no longer using the work wifi.

load more comments
view more: next ›