Aatube

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] Aatube@piefed.social 1 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

The examples mentioned are definitely not fair use

[–] Aatube@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

it's what it can be that motivates us

[–] Aatube@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

anti-electoralism is fully compatible with harm reduction, meaning it's not that you shouldn't vote but you shouldn't rely on it, shouldn't think it's the only way forward, shouldn't stop you from mutual aid and organizing instead of campaigning for some person

there are anti-electoralists plenty who don't believe in harm reduction though, of course, and I agree with you on that

[–] Aatube@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

neither judging, nor enforcing, is compatible with true-anarchism

Sorry, I tried to stress in the postscript that I know this process isn't binding. I'm asking how this process should be used in this case.

[–] Aatube@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

Whoops, I've gravely used the wrong word. I meant "restorative justice"...

I'll check out these links!

[–] Aatube@piefed.social 5 points 2 weeks ago

I don't see how that relates to the content of the deleted comments I can see from the modlog.