Hahaha!
No. Reading comprehension is more than just looking at words.
I stated, as a thought experiment, that if the penalty for murder is death, then all who participate will end up included in that sentencing if there are no differences in, who committed murder, or why.
I then made the statement of my belief, which seems to also be yours, that there should be no death penalty.
If you want someone to just argue with, might I suggest checking out an LLM? Then you won't have to expose your ignorance to all who can read and comprehend. Whom, may also be tagging your username with words you wouldn't like, to remember this is person just may be a half-wit, or troll.
Edit: omg π€£π€£ are you really down voting my replies, like it means something on lemmy? Just 'cause you don't like to be responded to, or that other people have their own opinions, or what there little dude/dudette?
We shouldn't. And if we were to make it "fair", anyone who is willing to participate in that kind of punishment would then be brought to justice under the same rule of law. So if one is willing to be an executioner, they to shall be executed. So the baddies would get their justice in the end too.
Then, we'd eventually either run out of peeps, or at least the "death is the answer" ones.