Count042

Probably the only non-evil response.

It fails the 'all it takes for evil to win is for good men to do nothing' test.

It fails the 'If I was in Nazi Germany, I would have resisted' test.

But I suspect that that isn't the reason used by Peter_Arbeitslos@feddit.de

I would guess that he would have supported Rhodesia if his government said that to oppose them was racist against white people.

You edited to add 'nowadays'.

What a cowardly edit.

How was it okay to back the terrorist group ANC (Nelson Mandela was a convicted terrorist) and call for the fall of the Apartheid South African government in the 80's, yet not okay to call for the downfall of the Apartheid ethnostate that Nelson Mandela said the concentration camp they created (Gaza) was worse then any of the Bantustans created by Apartheid South Africa?

What Israel is doing is quantitatively worse then Apartheid South Africa. Why was calling for the end of that government okay?

$5 says you're too much of a coward to answer that question, even if only to yourself.

You make up people calling for a Jewish genocide in this thread, but you still can't bring yourself to use the word Genocide for the state that set up torture rape camps that they used to rape doctors to death.

Why the double standard? Why does calling for a single state with equal rights for citizens constitute calling for a genocide, but you can't call the country that has bombed and destroyed every hospital and school while continuing to block all access to food genocidal?

Why the double standard?

But are they self sealing?

So freedom of speech shouldn't allow people to say that apartheid South Africa shouldn't exist? That Nazi Germany shouldn't be allowed to exist?

I can remember when opposing apartheid ethnostates was the correct moral opinion.

What happened?

What makes Israel different?

Or are double standards proof of anti semitism only when they're negative?

EDIT: No response needed from moral cowards that would have protected apartheid South Africa, Belgium Congo, or Nazi Germany from criticism that they should not be allowed to exist.

You probably won't read this, but things like this are EXACTLY why freedom of speech exists.

You would have condemned Nat Turner and justified slavery.

You've been denying every bit of that and been explicitly pro-israel to the point of deleting pro Palestinian comments over non-existent rules violations over in the news community.

I remember you defending the Sde Teiman torture-rape camp when the videos first came to light.

I find it impossible to believe someone, let alone a biased moderator of News, that defended Sde Teiman would find anything disturbing.

P.S. tags are fun.

A statement that makes it clear you haven't paid attention go Libya since NATO destroyed it.

They've shot down twenty. Not just one.

Maybe they'll do a better job than NATO.

Can't get much worse.

Germanies legal definition of antisemitism includes criticism of Israel.

Wow, that is some cope there.

20% is a lot less then the amount of PUMA people that didn't vote for Obama. (The point here is that the left rallies behind the centrist and right of the party far more then the centrists do. And yet you still blame the left.)

Maybe if the Democratic party wasn't addicted to feeling self righteous, and it your comment reflected reality (it doesn't) then the DNC would recognize the left as a voting block they have to appease to, you know, win.

You know, actually do politics rather then look down their noses at people demanding unreasonable stuff like health care.