By asking for clarification instead of jumping to some inflammatory assumptions. I was civil to you, and made no accusations against your character. Yet you were very quick to attack my character. Would you please refrain from such incivility in the future?
My apologies, I guess I wasn't clear enough. My point was that it's unfair to blame those things as results of progressive policies.
But hey, thanks for the gross mischaracterization of my perspective.
Japanese Internment
Two major Red Scares and a collapse in union membership
Legitimate criticisms
No they're not. Those two things were caused by far greater international factors. Like, you know, the 2nd World War.
Thanks! If I recall correctly, they just seemed like the exact same message, except as posts. I didn't really bother to look any now closely.
"she's" already made multiple posts. You just don't see them because we caught them quickly and banned those accounts.
Lol good job, op. Sorry, I almost banned you thinking you were "her" again, trying to circumvent their own ban.
If you hold it at 120° F for two hours you kill nearly everything
Which is distinctly different from everything. And the consequences of this literally affect your health. It's the reason there's a hard rule about the temperature. It's for safety.
Wait, what did Dave Coulier do?
Blasphemy. This user has been banned for this comment.
Oi, cunt! You're a proper fucker, aren't ya?
Give us a bit of credit, please. We can tell when insulting words are being used with respect. Context is key here.
That being said, there's been a significant rise in hateful sentiment, so I figured a proactive endeavor might be worthwhile.
That being said, if you have feedback on how mods should operate, you're welcome to join us! Come, be a mod! It pays absolutely nothing and is completely thankless. It'll be fun!
Please allow me to clarify my perspective on this discussion.
This commenter associated a bunch of effects with the progressive era.
You then replied with a thoughtful response that questioned most of their points.
But then you wrote
At this point, I read that as you acknowledging those two points as legitimate criticisms against the progressive era. This is what I disputed. I think those are unfair criticisms, as far as I understood the words you wrote.
This is all I said. I've jumped to no other conclusions. I've said nothing against you or your character. I've made no other assumptions. I simply wrote a response based off the words you used.
I see you've further clarified your perspective as well, and understand that we're of the same perspective on the matter. You have no need to be so defensive anymore, my dude.
Edit: the other commenter essentially proved that they were just baiting people into inflammatory discussion. They kept resorting to personal attacks and flip-flopped on their position solely to continue arguing. This behavior is not tolerated here. Please report such trolls in the future.