He and I had this talk two years ago.
Even_Adder
joined 2 years ago
He's not trying to get copyright for something he generated, he's trying to have the court award copyright to his AI system "DABUS", but copyright is for humans. Humans using Gen AI are eligible for copyright according to the latest guidance by the United States Copyright Office.
One of the provisions of fair use is the effects on the market. If your spambot is really shitting up the place, you may very well run afoul of the doctrine.
We're saying the same thing here. It's just your characterization of gen AI as a "tech-enabled copying device" isn't accurate. You should read this which breaks down how all this works.
The fair use doctrine allows you to do just that. The alternative would be someone being able to publish a book and then shutting anyone else out of publishing, discussing, or building on their ideas without them getting a kick-back.
The funny part is most of the headlines want you to believe that using things without permission is somehow against copyright. When in reality, fair use is a part of copyright law, and the reason our discourse isn't wholly controlled by mega-corporations and the rich. It's sad watching people desperately trying to become the kind of system they're against.
!localllama@sh.itjust.works
Reminder that this is made by Ben Zhao, the University of Chicago professor who stole open source code for his last data poisoning scheme.
Fuck 'em. I don't care. I hope no one uses them.