GalacticSushi

But what about all the honor and glory that comes with dying for an oil company's bottom line? Or dying to distract the public from the fact that the president is a child rapist?

The term for this is protein poisoning or protein toxicity. Less formally, rabbit starvation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protein_toxicity

That's a completely separate discussion. We're talking about gender dysphoria, not schizophrenia. I hope you understand why people assume you're a troll, because what is even the point of bringing that up in this context?

Somewhere around the majority of people ~~employed in academia~~ are absolutely useless.

"POV: You're doing something"

(Looks inside)

A meme that is showing a third person view of someone else doing something

🙂 <-- me after witnessing otherworldly horrors that are beyond my comprehension (I couldn't comprehend them)

"Eggs are down 400%"

-The moron in chief

Hundreds of billions is a more accurate figure. You could've also said they're worth multiple dollars and had been correct.

No need to slop up the place

It's just that the pressure to make the "correct" choice is fucking crazy.

I feel pressured to only ever present as a cisgendered heterosexual person regardless of whether that's correct or not. The pressure is for LGBTQ+ people to simply disappear from public society. Correct has nothing to do with it.

"Wrong" is probably not the best term for it. People's understanding of their own identity can evolve over time, but their own assessment of their sense of self will always be the most accurate barometer to go by. Yes, some people detransition, but as others have stated they're a small minority and ultimately that's their decision to make whether it's due to a change in how they identify or pressure from external forces.

But to the original commenter's point, we should just allow people to be the masters of their own identity and meet them where they are at any given point. If that were the case, the idea of getting it "wrong" wouldn't be a big deal at all, they could simply give us an update and the world keeps turning.

I think the point they were making is that a decent support system is not the sole determining factor as your post suggests.

Even your counterarguments rest on the assumption that this is true. You suggest that if it's not a support system they must be "inherently" good or evil, completely ignoring the more likely possibility that there are countless other variables that could factor into what kind of person someone becomes.