Glitterkoe

joined 2 years ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
Mark Zuckerberg Thinks You Don't Have Enough Friends and His Chatbots Are the Answer in c/technology@lemmy.world
I'm bored and desperately search for a proper game in c/games@lemmy.world
[–] Glitterkoe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Naturally we need to know which suggestions "won" ASAP

I'm bored and desperately search for a proper game in c/games@lemmy.world
[–] Glitterkoe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

With Railway it's the typical anticipation of strategy games that gets you. Just one more expansion of your network, one more resource to connect to a town, one more logistical puzzle to solve. It's way more intricate (in a good way) than just managing the budget and I've sunk hours and hours into some of those missions to figure them out.

I'm bored and desperately search for a proper game in c/games@lemmy.world
[–] Glitterkoe@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Railway Empire 2 hard to put down once you get going.

Wasteland 3 is awesome and akin to DOS2 and BG3!

Fighting the OS security as a geek in c/mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world
[–] Glitterkoe@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hmmm, never had to sudo ... or work with SELinux I see. I highly prefer that to other policy/admin rights solutions, though, but still.

Lemmy specific Apps and Libraries in c/fediverse@lemmy.world
[–] Glitterkoe@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Can highly recommend Summit! Perfect for Lemmy and it has recently gone open-source. !summit@lemmy.world

What task would you excel in if you lived in the Stone Age? in c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
What programs do you wish a good FOSS alternative existed, but doesn't or most of the FOSS alternatives simply aren't good? in c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
[–] Glitterkoe@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Hmm, LibreOffice may not be the prettiest, but it works. For my own documents and presentations I use Typst nowadays. That's a blazing fast modern typesetting alternative to LaTeX. That being said, I can't stand WYSIWIG stuff but that might not be everybody's cup of tea.

I mostly run into stubborn manufacturers like Roland that only release their musical instrument companion apps for Mac/Win and leave Linux Digital Audio Workstations hanging.

Who needs to retire anyway? in c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
[–] Glitterkoe@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

!lemmySilver

This is Wendy's in c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
[–] Glitterkoe@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

!lemmySilver

Just trying this out, don't mind me

They said the packaging would be discreet! in c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
[–] Glitterkoe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Now that's a strapon if I've ever seen one. And it might actually get off if it goes flacid halfway 🤔

^_^ I just think skibidibi sounds neat :3 in c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
[–] Glitterkoe@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Oof, so much nostalgia!

Lost the game!

1
Open sourcing Summit? (lemmy.world)
 

From what I understood, you didn't want to open-source Summit because you don't want to allocate your resources to managing issues and reviewing pull requests amongst other reasons (correct me if I'm wrong!). I don't know if you can disable Issues/PRs on GitHub, but I think it would give a lot of (potential) users peace of mind if the source code could be reviewed. As far as licensing goes, you could go quite stringent with an AGPL if that is a factor, to prevent closed-source clones.

Anyways, I find it sad to see that Summit often gets bashed in Lemmy application discussions for being "yet another proprietary app, no thanks".

That said, if setting up publishing actions or other packaging shenanigans is a hurdle, I'm sure there's people who would love to help.

14
Experience with LGPL dependencies? (lemmy.world)
 

Short version of a past post: I'm considering to license my startup's software under the LGPL license, which mostly concerns our "applied science" libraries. Does anybody have perspectives worth sharing on the usage/reception/dependency on LGPL libraries from a personal or company perspective? How often would it still be "blacklisted" like the GPL sometimes is?

Amongst other things the libraries do include tooling for a domain specific language (parser, compiler, language server). The reasoning would be that we would like to lower the barrier to integration of the methods and libraries versus GPL, but don't want proprietary (language) flavors popping up instead of open-sourced contributions somewhere. It might also somewhat prohibit larger parties from "overtaking" the project into something proprietary entirely.

Side note: our low-level elemental libraries are mostly MIT/Apache because these things aren't our core business and are mostly filling gaps where standard implementations are missing.

1
Noodgevallen en beheer (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Glitterkoe@lemmy.world to c/feddit_nl@feddit.nl
0 comments fedilink
 

Laat ik vooropstellen dat ik enorm blij ben dat er al een redelijk bevolkte Nederlandse Lemmy instance bestaat. Maar met instances als deze of bijvoorbeeld tchncs.de bekruipt mij toch altijd het gevoel dat het risicovol is met één persoon als beheerder. Moet de instance dan 'gewoon' verlaten worden in de hoop dat een nieuwe opkomt als de beheerder uit beeld raakt of wat dan ook?

Hoort deze fase van instances gewoon bij het zijn van 'early adopter'? Ik zou het heel vet vinden om een stichting of iets anders op te richten of te sponsoren als die zich in zou zetten voor een NL rijtje gefedereerde services met behoorlijke statuten die de gebruikers beschermen. Ik betaal daar met liefde en plezier een (vrijwillige) subscriptie voor van een paar € per jaar.

Of bestaat dit al?

view more: next ›