JTskulk

joined 2 years ago
[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Damn, TIL. I thought all Nazis were super big on Christianity, all the ones I've seen were.

[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I've noticed a lot of dead bees on the ground in the past few months. I figured that it's a good thing and that I'm seeing more dead ones because there are more active ones overall.

[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The Nazis hate Satan, please leave Satanists out of this.

[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Haha yep, same.

[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Dude pro Starcraft 1 is still going strong, Starcraft 2 came out in 2010, both alive games!

[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Slayer, Demon Hunter, Celldweller.

[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Sometimes you mess up an install, sometimes you just want to try different things and see what's out there. I had to do that a bit to get a sense of what kind of distros I like and don't like.

[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

And you don't have to fuck with drivers, especially for basic shit like the friggin hard drive. No forced accounts either!

[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (4 children)

That's the wonderful thing about distros, you can keep trying different ones until you find one you love or just get tired of changing lol.

[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That stops it from being Free, which is freedom 0. From GNU.org:

A program is free software if the program's users have the four essential freedoms:

  1. The freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose (freedom 0).
  2. The freedom to study how the program works, and change it so it does your computing as you wish (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
  3. The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help others (freedom 2).
  4. The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others (freedom 3). By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to benefit from your changes. Access to the source code is a precondition for this.

A program is free software if it gives users adequately all of these freedoms. Otherwise, it is nonfree. While we can distinguish various nonfree distribution schemes in terms of how far they fall short of being free, we consider them all equally unethical.

What you're talking about is changing Free software to be non-Free. No thanks.

[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Aphex Twin is still revisitable 😭

view more: next ›