JackGreenEarth

joined 2 years ago
[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

You already asked this in another community. Next time, cross post it so the comments are linked.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The meaning? It seems fairly self evident, a critique of internet arguments, not far from that cliche of 'touching grass'

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 19 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Under User Taga

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (22 children)

GIMP doesn't mean anything though (besides for GNU Image Manipulation Program)? Why are you bringing it up?

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago
  1. 'I' is the thing that is thinking it

  2. I don't 'believe' that my senses are real, but that it's good enough to act as though they are real, regarding the sensory world.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I am a trans person and disagree with basically everything you've said. The only reason I upvoted this post is because censorship is really a problem and you should be allowed to say this stuff even if I vehemently disagree with you - I'm not going to change your mind if you're banned or censored, or my talking down to you. If this post gets taken down, I don't mind having a discussion with you via PMs.

I can understand you fear getting your account banned if you say your opinions, however you should be aware that using inflammatory language like 'trans agenda' or 'transgenderism' will make people less happy to engage with you in good faith. I'm not saying you shouldn't be allowed to say that, but rather using more neutral language to discuss your opinions may result in a more productive conversation, as advice. I welcome your reply :)

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
  1. I am thinking about whether I exist as a conscious being. Therefore there must be an 'I' to be thinking that.

  2. I can't prove that my senses can be trusted with 100% certainty to tell me truth - in fact I can prove the opposite with things like optical illusions. However, when interacting with the world that I only know is real through my senses, basing my behaviour on those same senses that let me know the world exists seems reasonable to me. That's what I call practical knowledge, rather than true knowledge.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

That sounds like a cool premise!

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 8 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

If it's impossible to censor people, you would hardly have a strong prosecution arguing you should have done something impossible.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

No, just the GNOME Tweaks app. And extensions are fully supported in my experience, by the way

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

You can absolutely use custom GTK themes. I used WhiteSur theme for a while before switching back to default

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 5 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

I think most people, including me, appreciate how it looks cleaner though. On Android I get you, they should allow custom themes, but for Linux you can easily swap to a more information dense one.

 

Rules:

*You can teleport into and out of it at will

*It has a couple of plug sockets and can connect to internet from the region you teleported in from

*You can take objects and people with you

*As already stated, it is (3m)^3 (3m*3m*3m). The walls are plain plaster with a light in the middle of the ceiling. The pocket dimension is topologically toroidal, so if there weren't walls and a ceiling/floor (which you can actually destroy) you would loop if you went more than 3m in any direction. Gravity, then, is artificial and can be altered to anywhere from 0 to 2g from a dial on the wall.

Edit: additional specifications

*You can only teleport out to where you teleported in from.

*Time proceeds at the same rate inside the pocket dimension

*There is an eject button for those inside to get out if something happens to you

view more: ‹ prev next ›