JackGreenEarth

joined 2 years ago
[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

I would disagree on just one of those, ADHD literally stands for attention deficit hyperactive disorder, so if you're not hyperactive, you don't have ADHD, you have ADD. Which can still be valid!

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 57 points 3 weeks ago

Not a Jew, but my family's Jewish, and it's about as difficult as you'd expect. They get offended by the slightest implication that maybe Israel isn't perfect, assume I support Hamas just because I'm opposed to the IDF killing children - to clarify, I'm opposed to anyone killing children, including Hamas. We don't talk about it that much though.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 8 points 3 weeks ago

He's considered a false prophet, certainly not in a place of honour. At least by orthodox Jews.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 7 points 3 weeks ago

I'll mention one nobody has said yet: Kaos.

The last episode was definitely setting up a second reason that looked interesting, but then it never happened.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

Moist filament leads to bubbly prints :)

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I use empty cardboard boxes and shoe boxes to store my coin collection, and one to use to dry out my spools of filament.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Someone can have a fundamental belief that they shouldn't have.

Someone can also have a derivative belief from another derivative belief, without the prior belief having to be fundamental.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So glad you found a working solution! To be honest, I'm a bit surprised iOS allows terminal apps 🤣 But in a good way

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Ok, now I've clarified what beliefs you think some people assume without evidence, I would still say that believing those things isn't right. You should still have a good reason for believing what you believe, and taking the existence of a conscious creator as given is invalid.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

So if I'm understanding you correctly it's not just that people believe the universe was created by something, but they have a specific idea of what that thing is - eg a conscious, powerful, morally good, knowledgeable being

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

So can I clarify that when you're saying

Some people take the existence of god as a brute fact

That you mean

Some people assume that universe was created by something

?

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago

The world is a terrible place.

The world is the best place it's ever been.

The world could be much better.

Reference

view more: ‹ prev next ›