The quote in the article, I think, is that they "took [her] name out". I'm guessing it means the character's name. Seems like the character had a few scenes and lines and such that all go cut, so they cut the character's name, too.
JakenVeina
joined 2 years ago
I came into this thread thinking I'd just post "Uhh, it was pretty nice?"
Then I read the post text. Jesus fuck.
The other comments are probably right, no real point in doing anything but ignoring them. But goddamn, my first instinct would be to try and call them out on that bullshit attitude. No way am I clever enough to do it effectively, though.
The only one that isn't a red flag here is #1.
Props to whoever this company is. This is one of the best bits of customer service I've seen in years.
General practice for JWTs is to keep a list of "revoked but not yet expired" tokens, and check against that. That list will generally be tiny, since each item only stays on the list for as long as the normal lifetime of a token is, so it's not really burdensome to maintain and replicate.