overview for JuanPeece

It finally makes sense in c/anarchychess@sopuli.xyz

[–] JuanPeece@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's a decently strong opening that doesn't require much thought. You can play it against damn near any of blacks openings, and generally leads to a strong position, but people like to dog on it since it's a bit "braindead". Gets played even at GM level tho

map reducer in c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

[–] JuanPeece@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And then you fuck up your asynchronous timing, leaving a race condition where the sandwich has bread on the inside. Oh, and QA can only reproduce sometimes

Adobe turns subscription screw again, telling users to pay up or downgrade in c/technology@lemmy.zip

[–] JuanPeece@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah imo it definitely depends on what the tool is. If there's a bunch of data processing/aggregation that's being handled by said service, it makes sense that there would be a recurring cost. API licensing ain't cheap. (However I'm super biased, as I write software for an app using a SaaS yearly subscription model)