LarmyOfLone

joined 1 year ago
[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

First, they came for all the motherfucking politicans. Then they came for the lobbyists, then the CEOs and billionaires and the propagandists and the corrupt judges. And if they haven't been beheaded yet, they had peace happily ever after!

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

It's also not as if we can't launch spacecrafts at all, as long as your destination is high orbit the chances of collision are low.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Oh is that the bastard administrator from hell?

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

True, the american dream, liberty, land of opportunity, make your own way, that's why people come. But it's a lie right? So can a lie be a culture? Or is it a mass delusion? Maybe, colonial settlers also went to the US despite knowing how dangerous it is to die on a wagon train (I mean dysentery, not indians haha). So taking a huge risk of catastrophic failure could bee seen as a culture.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Compared to that (strictly enforced quarantine for sick people) the US not only failed to stem the spread of the pandemic, the president and his cult expressively espoused dangerous quack medicine.

Generally China organized regular food delivery to people in quarantine and had countless teams tracing infection. Meanwhile the US forced the "essential" lowest class workers to expose themselves and even encouraged their maga cult to spit on people to infect them.

Countless preventable deaths are the result, plus even more people with lowered mental faculties from Covid. And then you elected the same cult leader again!

I haven't been to China but that would only give you anecdotal stories. I also don't speak chinese or read chinese social media, but I can read statistics. But yeah, there is no "peace" but an uneasy acceptance of censorship in China.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

That's important too, but that isn't just moving the goalpost, it's a completely different metric. But even if you're a staunch nationalist you might look at how Chinese people feel about the system and if you could replicate that system in Ghana.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

What I meant is "having much power / authority without being accountable to some third party". And yeah, taking the mask off is the only good thing about Trump. The US will never get their image back.

PS: The other good thing might be crashing the global economy might be positive for lowering GHG - but at what cost??? (haha)

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree but using it that way just creates confusion. Just call it imperialist or terrorist state. Or even outwardly fascist / nationalist. Authoritarian is used to denote how they treat their own citizens.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Western democracy has revealed glaring problems with selecting governance, especially if the majority of the media is captured like in the US, and if elected officials have to beg special interest for money or be chosen / filtered through that process, or has to lie to the electorate. That China is doing relatively well despite being authoritarian, not having to be corrupted through that mechanism of election (an alternative might be sortition to prevent filtering for the worst vipers). But it's also lucky in that it's a "benign" authority still based on socialism and that it's not an enemy or plaything of the US. But even though it works for the people (for the people) it's not democratic (by the people)

Partially that is because China derives it's treasure from the people so education and productivity are important and with that some quality of life. There are plenty of pro forma socialist governments that only care to enrich themselves based on natural resources and can just brutalize and neglect it's population. So it's not just because of socialist ideology, it's where the money is for China. And afaik China still has it's corruption problems.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (31 children)

China is authoritarian, but if you look only at the material conditions for democracy like prosperity, peace, education they are better than the US. People fundamentally want to exist and raise families in peace without constant terror, confusion and economic hardship. That is because even they are authoritarian, they can still "afford" to have pro-human or pro-national ideology. In the neoliberal countries choosing that over profit gets you fired or sidelined.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don't think you can call it a culture but propaganda to justify their personal greed and neoliberal policies. Basically sociopathy as an ideology for the elite, dressed up as "whatever" for the masses.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The F-droid app is complete garbage, also they don't make it easy to install apps that are open source but don't follow GPL. Obtainium is perfect, just point to git repository. Now all we need is a P2P source control service.

view more: ‹ prev next ›