Mr_Dr_Oink

joined 2 years ago
[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

That's totally fair. I, like many, have watched in horror as games get more and more expensive. I dont buy that many anymore either. I dont have as much time to play as i used to.

If i am being fair, though, the scope of games has changed significantly since the early days of gaming in terms of hours of content and quality of graphics and what they can do. Storylines, cinematics, everything has been slowly becoming bigger since the days of playing streets of rage on a sega genesis and completing it in a few hours. With 3 characters to pick from and a limited set of moves with enemies that get more health, they hit harder but are just a reskin of a previous enemy.

I dont think 70 or 80 dollars is a good price. It's too expensive. But i also dont think games should be 30 or 40 dollars brand new.

But in saying that. There were games back then that cost more than 80 dollars. And n64 games used to cost in the 60 dollar region when they were new. Same with ps1 games. I think over 20 to 30 years for the price of games to have risen by between 10 and 30 dollars is not that crazy, even if they are too expensive now. 60 dollars was a lot more in the 90s than it is today.

The original ps1 would cost almost 800 dollars in todays money.

Overall i think nintendo are greedy and they go to far with raising the prices. I just think everyone pointing at nintendo need to remember that its the industry as a whole that has raised prices to where they are, not just nintendo.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (3 children)

If we are being real you could look up the preorder prices of the games and see that 80 dollars is the maximum.

I can't speak for the US but in the EU, some retailers are ignoring the RRP nintendo set and selling games way cheaper.

Even in the UK, where this isn't the case, I am seeing £75 for mario kart. Only £5 more than most games cost these days.

Also £65 for donkey kong which is £5 less than standard.

I appreciate that nintendo games dont tend to drop in cost over time and perhaps like many others you would prefer to try to justify piracy (to be clear, and fair, i have pirated games,tv and movies of the years, but dont tend to do it much these days) then by all means, dont by these games, dont by the switch 2. But dont lie about what it is and what it costs just to be part of the rage.

I find it so strange that the people who pirate games are getting mad about the cost of games they are going to pirate anyway. I am not saying thats you, because i dont know you, but a lot of this rage comes from people who were never going to pay for it in the first place. Its baffling.

But anyway, the point is, if you are going to be mad at it, then at least be mad at what it actually is, yeah?

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think i might have this, too! Is it like a static feeling? Like o old CRT screens?

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I would rock the wood block! 🤘

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago (8 children)

I can count almost perfect seconds. Most people think they can count seconds until they try to prove it.

Like, give me a stopwatch. I can count seconds to within an average of .05 of a second.

I can do this consistently over a long period of time, i gave up counting when i tested it.

It's because i used to have 3 clocks in my living room, and they all used to tick at different times. I guess from when the battery was connected and it would create all these different rhythms.

After many years of hearing these rhythms and noticing the different rhythms that would be made as we changed the batteries over time, i ended up being able to tap the rhythm out on a table/in my head etc and now its just ingrained into my head.

taTA ta... taTA ta... taTA ta...

Absolutely useless.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hey, yeah, of course. I was joking. It wasn't obvious. I see that reading it back.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You could try starting with some cable management and then maybe move on to more cable management.

Seriously, at the very least why arent these cables behind your shelving instead of draping over the front edge? Thats crazy. Then you have a pc in the middle with cables going both ways. Is that a LAN cable coming from the right? Drill a hole and run that through the wall and either run it along your skirting board or get some trunking.

You can even remove the skirting, cut away a small section from the bottom back corner of the skirt to create a channel for the cable.

If i was you i would reorganize all of the devices, run all the cables in the same direction and as shown in another comment run them down the leg of the shelf and then across to the tv. And move the PC to the shelf. (Maybe the side of the shelf)

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago

If a woman i wanted to date didn't find me funny when i do goofy shit, then she would quickly become a woman i dont want to date.

I can be immature without that being my whole personality. I am mature when it's appropriate and immature when it's appropriate.

Just be yourself. You dont want to lock it all away to be in a relationship with someone who can't laugh at a well-timed fart.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

I see where you are coming from, and have thought about this before when there was a group of people near where i live who were doing a sort of vigilante mob tracking down suspected pedophiles and terrorising them.

It just made me consider that they might be attacking people with a mental disorder who could/should be treated.

But just to speak to what you said, if they are non-offending, are you talking about the ones that dont physically assault children? Because the ones who are viewing and distributing csam are still harming children. Maybe not directly, but its like supply and demand, isn't it? People make it if people want it.

I think perhaps even the violent ones should be treated for a mental disorder. Maybe punsihed too, but if you draw parallels to other violent crime, many argue other criminals should be rehabilitated. Should this extend to pedophiles too?

The more i type, the more nuanced this becomes in my head. Perhaps that in and of itself is evidence that despite the obvious knee-jerk reaction to probably one of the most heinous things a person can do. Perhaps there is just more to this than anyone is brave enough to admit. (I say brave because anyone that sees you defending a pedophile automatically accuses you of being a pedophile, which is a fucking pathetic leap to make)

Having said all of that. If anyone ever did anything like that to my kids, i would rip their fucking heads off.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't this rely on the premise that the goal of capitalism is the only possible goal?

Do we need to progress at auch a rapid rate? Isn't rapid progress what got us into the place we are now?

Capitalism has fueled the growth of industry, which has accelerated global warming, the destruction of flora and fauna that are essential to life as we know it. It has created billionaires who only care about being richer and planted the belief in billions of peoples heads that they need to strive to this goal as well.

You can blame governments all you want. But i think thats too simplistic of a view of where the corruption started. They didnt bribe themselves into allowing people to become billionaires. It was a slow process with many moving parts and the greed, fueled by capitalists is why we are in this state.

Just blaming the government is ignoring so many factors.

I personally would prefer to live in a world that only develops things it needs, including leisure items/products but not in excess and never in the name of profit. We shouldn't bankrupt half the world to sit on our IP thrones and call it good.

Its bullshit.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I sometimes wonder about this. If a company can't stay afloat without being paid for by advertisements, if their product can't make enough money on its own to keep the company working, then is that product that important?

I appreciate it doesn't work that way.

I just think if taxes could pay for water, gas, electric, healthcare, roads and infrastructure etc, then maybe we dont really need a fridge that can make a shopping list for us whilst i play doom on the screen.

Maybe we dont need slap chops and shakeweights.

Maybe we dont need all the crap out there that just isnt important.

Does my phone really need a folding screen or web access? Do we really need social media? Or youtube? In some cases, maybe, yes. But in the majority? No. I dont think we do.

 
view more: next ›