Nomecks

joined 2 years ago
[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 week ago (27 children)

So far, but corruption is always the end result.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 week ago

The break even on carbon emissions from manufacture vs. daily use is somewhere between around 3 and 10 years. Big trucks on the low end.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

I thought the protocol was "Don't look up".

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago (13 children)

It gets paid for by savings in road network maintenance. More people on transit = less cars destroying everything.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did you report doordash to the police?

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago (5 children)

No third party will ever have a chance of being successful. The Dems and Repubs wrote the laws to make sure of it. That's why they can't.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Seems like a no lose scenario for the Liberals: Courts will strike this down and the Liberals take another talking point away from the Conservatives.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The battery density needed to make electric flight possible is ~400wh/KG, which we are well past. There's no technological limitations blocking transatlantic flight.

Also, the question wasn't if we were close, it was if it's easier in ships or planes.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Aviation, simply because the regulations are so intense. The technology is there for both already, but it will be far easier to cram a freighter with batteries than a plane because of the engineering and safety requirements. Ships need a minimum of fault tolerance compared to planes, for example.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 week ago

No, he was too busy making out with his Marilyn Monroebot

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Mexico is the best: Por Favor No Moleste

view more: ‹ prev next ›