Pro

joined 1 month ago
 

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has announced that his country plans to recognise the State of Palestine at the United Nations.

In a Friday post on X, Carney stated: “Canada supports a two-state solution which guarantees peace and security for Israelis and Palestinians.” He added that Ottawa “will work intensively in all fora to further that end, including through the participation of the Minister of Foreign Affairs at the UN High-Level Conference on a Two-State Solution in New York next week.

The Prime Minister also said that Canada condemns the Israeli government’s failure to prevent the rapid deterioration of the humanitarian adisaster in the Gaza Strip.

Earlier, French President Emmanuel Macron declared his intention to recognise the State of Palestine in September 2025.

In response, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu strongly condemned the move, saying that the establishment of a Palestinian state would pose a threat to Israel’s security.

Meanwhile, the Hamas movement welcomed Macron’s intention to recognise Palestine during the UN General Assembly in September.

Hamas described the move as a positive step in the right direction towards justice for the oppressed Palestinian people and support for their legitimate right to self-determination and the establishment of an independent Palestinian state on all of its occupied territory, with Jerusalem as its capital.

 
 
 
 

The Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division today announced that it has filed a response in support of the City of Seattle’s Motion to Terminate the Consent Decree in United States v. City of Seattle. The decree required reforms in the Seattle Police Department’s practices regarding use of force, crisis intervention, stops and detentions, supervision and accountability. With support from the Justice Department, the Seattle Police Department (SPD) achieved sustained substantial compliance.

[–] Pro@reddthat.com 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Calling them "beggers" is shitty and outdated...

Go on.... what is the newer term?

you should be saying what geographic area you're in

Nice try, CIA.

[–] Pro@reddthat.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Remove Capitalism, then what?

[–] Pro@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago

Dickish World.

[–] Pro@reddthat.com -4 points 1 week ago (10 children)

guaranteed basic income

This has been studied a lot of times and mostly there is usually 2 concerns:

  • How you will finance the whole thing?
  • How do people act when you give them extra money?

Now, for the first concern: I had never seen anyone even answer it theoretically.

For the second concern: there is a mixed results, some studies suggest that people productivity gets lower, others suggest otherwise.

I don't see this even applied in a small village.

Just to be clear, I am talking about the widely known UBI, there is NIT and even other universal welfare schemes. IMO, even other universal welfare schemes has their own set of unsolved issues, and very experimental and idealistic in nature.

[–] Pro@reddthat.com -2 points 1 week ago (12 children)

OK, let us try again here.

Poverty and hunger.

[–] Pro@reddthat.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

How do you do that?

That is from my opinion, impossible to achieve.

[–] Pro@reddthat.com -4 points 1 week ago (14 children)
  • Human suffering.
  • Climate Change.
[–] Pro@reddthat.com -5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
view more: ‹ prev next ›