The_Lurker

joined 2 years ago
[–] The_Lurker@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I didn't look at the feed and thought this was basketball news.

[–] The_Lurker@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

From my Oklahoma friend: "Give Texas back to Mexico!"

[–] The_Lurker@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Damn, hoped it was real.

[–] The_Lurker@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'd prefer base 10 time than base 12. Until then I'll just keep with am pm

[–] The_Lurker@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Both. Both is good.

[–] The_Lurker@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Pretty much what happens really. Hole is just a little lower.

[–] The_Lurker@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Unlimited manpower, a theocratic government with the religious head as the head of the government, and unlimited beer.

[–] The_Lurker@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

We will completely engulf Canada. We'll see who's laughing then!

We'll have all the poutine!

[–] The_Lurker@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago
[–] The_Lurker@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

It's for harassment. Even shit lawsuits cost serious money to defend. Yeah, it's unwinnable, but but the company defending might choose to not publicly side with a boycott or engage in one, which is the goal of these apocalypse seeking lunatics.

Also, lawyers don't take civil rights cases anymore since the Supreme Court ruled the lawyer couldn't get paid out of government reparations to the victims. Constitutional violation cases take time and a shit load of money to prosecute, something most victims don't have.

There was a recent decision continuing this trend.

https://studentbriefs.law.gwu.edu/crcl/2024/11/11/the-importance-of-attorneys-fees-in-civil-rights-cases-a-look-at-lackey-v-stinnie/

[–] The_Lurker@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Yeah. I think it was on the wall of the old place.

[–] The_Lurker@lemmy.world 34 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Chino Bandito in Phoenix. Chinese/Mexican food. Carnitas+ pork fried rice rocks .

view more: next ›