what i got from reading this is that it's not X, but Y.
aio
Well, it is true that computer programs have far surpassed humans in board games. They are very well suited for it. It just has nothing to do with the hypothesized abilities of future "AI" as rationalists conceive them.
Oh, I didn't know that!
The paper is itself written by LLM.
flaviat explained why your counterexample is not correct. But also, the correct statement (Liouville's theorem) is that a bounded entire function must be constant.
CS has a huge number of people who think you can derive the solutions to social problems from first principles. It's impossible to reason with them.
In this case these are grade schooler's (roughly ages 9-18) essays for a standardized test, so there isn't a body of students who could grade them.
Given consistent trends of exponential performance improvements over many years and across many industries, it would be extremely surprising if these improvements suddenly stopped.
I have a Petri dish to sell you
codeword is banana bread
Will there be statues to swap as well?
Mistress
is this more evidence that robots are taking our jobs? the investigation continues...
article is informing me that it isn't X - it's Y