baxster

joined 2 years ago
[–] baxster@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for the input and i will look into it again because I really like the idea. Can I send you a DM if I run in some problems along the way?

[–] baxster@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Today i have a torrenting server. A headless ubuntu server with qbittorrent-nox tjat i acccess via a webbroswer. I have trouble setting up the same with i2p (haven't looked at it super much). I get torrenting over ipsnark on my PC to work but the headless webui i2p torrenting I don't get to work. Especially when I whant to surf i2p with the same router that I torrenting over. The goal is to have it in docker.

One more problem I always get is that I am always "firewalled" when I search some people say open ports in router and other say don't.

[–] baxster@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for the tip! I use pihole and been using it for years so the blocking part is already taken care of😊

[–] baxster@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Now i am going to set up unbound. I am sick of DNS blocking...

[–] baxster@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I understand what you mean and can agree with you to some extent. It is good in that it clearly helps to counter extremism.

The problem I see is when a party can be against backdoors when they talk about elections for the country and then vote yes in the EU. Then comes "defense" – now we are no longer talking about the country but the entire EU, and these are two different things.

I also don't quite understand what you mean by "all-in" voting.

I hope they will take privacy seriously. I don't think they will. Poland has a new proposal that doesn't seem to be liked by the Council of Ministers. If chat control goes through, I believe it will break with previous laws and regulations "for the greater good."

[–] baxster@sopuli.xyz 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Yes know that it is different instances. But encryption becomes more and more an hot topic. And the split between EU, government, Law enforcement authorities and the military is concerning.

We vote on the "big" parties of our country's and the same party that says no to backdoors I'm the government can say yes in EU and vice versa.

So what I really want to say is if we can't agree on what we want's it's going to result in bad and weird laws. We can't say yes and no at the same time.

I hope you get what I mean..

[–] baxster@sopuli.xyz 16 points 4 months ago (5 children)

So they havet changed their mind about chat control? You can't say yes and no at the same time.

 

Chatcontrol is once again stopped. Good work again everyone who stood up, this is once again a win everytime it is a win.

Next country that is up for Presidency is Poland 🇵🇱 who are anti-chatcontrol.

Patrick Breyer website

chatcontrol timeline

StopScanMe

 

Germany and Poland may say yes to chatcontrol!

Take Action! Send email your politicians now! Links: patrick-breyer.de Permanent Representatives Committee

3
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by baxster@sopuli.xyz to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
 

Chat control is back on the agenda again and the works is kept in secret.

Link to document

Take Action!

Edit: More information about the meeting