causepix

joined 1 month ago
[–] causepix@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

immediately after you flop

Where did that happen??

Press should be free period, and the audience should hold them to a higher standard than they do

These are mutually exclusive demands. You cannot have a "free press" that is also "held to a higher standard". Either they're free to report what they want and be influenced by outside interests, or they're held to a standard of fact-based and unbiased reporting. The two are almost never going to coincide, especially in a system driven by capital. Whether you want to face that reality or not is your prerogative.

[–] causepix@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

You'd rather western press where they can publish any lie and denial of reality that suits capital interests? There are certain lies propagated by the west for the purpose of destabilizing the DPRK, which I don't believe the DPRK is obligated to let float around in order for me to respect their democratic sovereignty.

You just won't convince me that it's a bad thing to enforce a shared observable reality which can be questioned and improved upon but not invented out of whole cloth to serve imperialist interests. The people don't need to be told what their interests are; they're the ones living their daily lives to observe that, and should be the ones doing the telling. Anything reported to them should be a plain factual recounting of events.

A democracy based on lies and manipulation is no democracy at all, which ironically happens to be what we have here in the west. For as "free" as our media purports to be, good luck getting any reach without a capitalist backing you in some form (especially before social media but even today; now that they've captured a large enough audience; the capitalists behind big tech are tightening up on what is allowed to have a platform). Which explains why you always see westerners project that onto any country they consider worse off and "authoritarian", as if that is the sole reason why and actually "the free press" makes us immune to it.

[–] causepix@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

I'm the opposite. Love automation (literally a programmer by trade lol), hate hate hate base building.

[–] causepix@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I've never played the game. Been meaning to for a while but so far have really only heard third-hand accounts of it. From the very little I know though that seems like a real possibility and honestly I prefer that interpretation.

@Jayjader@jlai.lu 's explanation gave me the impression it was nature's way of fighting back against unsustainable practices. Like it lets you play as a bad guy and see the consequences of doing so, rather than pitting you against some diagetic evil and painting everything you do in a morally justified light.

I might have to eat crow on this one though, like I said I don't even have entry level knowledge here.

[–] causepix@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago

There's a section about this in the article. Plants take up lead from the soil they grow in (This phenomenon is actually well known and sometimes employed to decontaminate soil in brownfields; those plants aren't used for human consumption though obvs) However, the companies don't disclose where their raw goods are sourced from so it's impossible to know for sure.

[–] causepix@lemmy.ml 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Liberals arent a singular group

They are when your definition of a liberal is material rather than aesthetic.

[–] causepix@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago

Yeah idk how they even measure that sort of thing and I'm skeptical as well, that's just the numbers floating around. I wonder too if it's tied to literacy in any way.

Though I suppose there are different ways for brains to work than just verbally. Some people's brains turn sounds into colors (perfect pitch), some brains don't have visual memory (aphantasia), and others supposedly have photographic memory. So who knows how this all actually shakes out.

[–] causepix@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Not necessarily

[–] causepix@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

lol that's not what I'm referring to. What they call themselves doesn't matter, what matters is whether their policies/laws and/or philosophy/ideology align with neoliberal principals. In other words; we only care about the material reality of the matter. This is because Marxists follow a framework called dialectical materialism.

Words, especially those which a politician or lawmaker uses to market themselves to the public, are not material. They can't be measured in any meaningful way and they don't necessarily reflect reality. (You can, however, measure the material indications and effects of those words if you're inclined to do so, but that's besides my point.)

[–] causepix@lemmy.ml 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)

War is peace, apparently.

[–] causepix@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago

annihilation. great try though.

view more: next ›