cheesybuddha

joined 10 months ago
[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

I could be wrong, but I don't believe that crabs flesh contains the enzymes that break it down the way lobsters do. I do believe you can buy fresh, dead crab at some markets.

But you should definitely kill any living ones before boiling

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

But when your boss tells you that you have to keep doing it this way, then you don't have much choice in the matter. You either keep asking AI for new code and hope it gets it right, or you have to actually delve into the code and spend your time correcting it.

The 1 million lines of code is just untenable, assuming they want code that actually works.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

LLMs are - by the nature of how they work - only able to achieve 90-95% accuracy. That's the theoretical best they can do, according to the people behind OpenAI. And worse, it will be presented as 100% accurate, even going so far as to make up sources wholecloth.

That's an insane and completely unacceptable error rate for any system even pretending to be mission critical.

Can you imagine sending people to space with a system that has a 1 in 20 chance of just being completely unfit for service?

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

But when they don't pass, then you have to dissect a bunch of AI pasta, right?

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

I dunno man, I tried coding a simply http listener with an LLM one time in python (a language I'm unfamiliar with). Just something to sit on a port, listen for a request, and run a script.

I ended up spending more time troubleshooting the maybe two dozen lines of code than I would have spent just looking up a tutorial online.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Instead of boiling them alive, yes.

Lobsters are the one you are going to see alive most, though, as their meat breaks down very quickly after they die. That isn't true of most other crustaceans, at least not to the same degree

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm no expert, but given the distributed nature of the stuff I'm seeing with Ukraine against Russia, I would think a "not all eggs in the same basket" approach would be the best idea

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

That's the only thing they're good at

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That was me, and my point was that we already had a suitable, regulated, and relatively safe system in place, ie taxis, so there's no need for innovation that will needlessly endanger people.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

You know what the first thing I think whenever I see a guy driving a large truck?

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

The name Trump will be treated like the name Adolf. Orange spray tans will be the new Charlie Chaplin mustache.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's entirely possible it will simply be a scheme to transfer billions of dollars into their own pockets. Things gonna be made out of sheet aluminum and zip ties and cost 30 trillion dollars

view more: next ›